Martin Piber
Impact in
-
- Accounting and Organizational Management
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
Papers in
-
- Cultural Industries and Urban Development 5
-
- Accounting and Organizational Management 5
- Co-authors
- Michael Habersam (6 shared papers)Matti Skoog (3 shared papers)Paola Demartini (4 shared papers)Lucia Biondi (4 shared papers)Albrecht Becker (1 shared paper)Christopher S. Chapman (1 shared paper)Markus Granlund (1 shared paper)Teemu Malmi (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Martin Piber
15 papers receiving 393 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Management Information Systems 143
- Strategy and Management 202
- Accounting 108
- Urban Studies 48
- Public Administration 23
Countries citing papers authored by Martin Piber
This map shows the geographic impact of Martin Piber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin Piber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin Piber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martin Piber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin Piber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin Piber. The network helps show where Martin Piber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Martin Piber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 116 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 100 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 12 | Pursuing civic engagement through Participatory Cultural Initiatives: mapping value creation, outcome, performance and legitimacy | 2017 | 4 |
| 13 | Exploring Intellectual Capital in Hospitals - Two Qualitative Case Studies in Italy and Austria | 2003 | 2 |
| 14 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 15 | The Outreach of Participatory Cultural Initiatives: the Importance of Creating and Exchanging Knowledge | 2018 | 1 |
About Martin Piber
Martin Piber is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Accounting and Clinical Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Industries and Urban Development (5 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (5 papers), Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (4 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (3 papers), Arts, Culture, and Music Studies (2 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (2 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (2 papers) and Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (143 citations), Strategy and Management (202 citations), Accounting (108 citations), Urban Studies (48 citations) and Public Administration (23 citations). Martin Piber has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Italy and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Michael Habersam, Matti Skoog, Paola Demartini, Lucia Biondi, Albrecht Becker, Christopher S. Chapman, Markus Granlund, Teemu Malmi, Allan Hansen and Andrea Mennicken. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Perspectives on Accounting, The Journal of Arts Management Law and Society, International Journal of Cultural Policy, Museum Management and Curatorship and Cities.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.