Annick Bourguignon

859 total citations
21 papers, 424 citations indexed

About

Annick Bourguignon is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Urban Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Annick Bourguignon has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 424 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Management Information Systems, 9 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 4 papers in Urban Studies. Recurrent topics in Annick Bourguignon's work include Accounting and Organizational Management (13 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (6 papers) and Management Theory and Practice (4 papers). Annick Bourguignon is often cited by papers focused on Accounting and Organizational Management (13 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (6 papers) and Management Theory and Practice (4 papers). Annick Bourguignon collaborates with scholars based in France, Denmark and United Kingdom. Annick Bourguignon's co-authors include Hanne Nørreklit, Ève Chiapello, Ricardo Azambuja, Gazi Islam, Alan Jenkins and Françoise Giraud and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Management Studies, Management Accounting Research and Organization.

In The Last Decade

Annick Bourguignon

19 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Annick Bourguignon France 10 266 119 119 88 61 21 424
Jeffrey F. Shields United States 5 278 1.0× 134 1.1× 131 1.1× 193 2.2× 32 0.5× 9 475
Martin Piber Austria 9 143 0.5× 65 0.5× 202 1.7× 108 1.2× 55 0.9× 15 424
Éric Pezet France 10 164 0.6× 150 1.3× 55 0.5× 53 0.6× 113 1.9× 29 394
Fabrizio Panozzo Italy 7 261 1.0× 81 0.7× 60 0.5× 185 2.1× 36 0.6× 18 437
Claire Dambrin France 10 171 0.6× 169 1.4× 60 0.5× 105 1.2× 137 2.2× 23 426
Robert Ochoki Nyamori Australia 8 107 0.4× 133 1.1× 114 1.0× 79 0.9× 75 1.2× 13 355
Philip D. Bougen United States 11 195 0.7× 99 0.8× 76 0.6× 201 2.3× 93 1.5× 15 447
Pauline Gleadle United Kingdom 11 56 0.2× 92 0.8× 111 0.9× 68 0.8× 53 0.9× 19 359
François Brouard Canada 10 88 0.3× 114 1.0× 89 0.7× 97 1.1× 65 1.1× 39 360
Philippe Naccache France 7 43 0.2× 161 1.4× 103 0.9× 30 0.3× 99 1.6× 15 327

Countries citing papers authored by Annick Bourguignon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annick Bourguignon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annick Bourguignon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annick Bourguignon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annick Bourguignon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annick Bourguignon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annick Bourguignon. The network helps show where Annick Bourguignon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annick Bourguignon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annick Bourguignon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annick Bourguignon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annick Bourguignon. Annick Bourguignon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bourguignon, Annick, et al.. (2022). Publish and perish: How critical scholars are increasing trapped into toxic double binds. 12(1). 45–54. 1 indexed citations
2.
Bourguignon, Annick. (2019). The priming role of qualitative research in constructivist management control teaching. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management. 16(4). 463–490. 5 indexed citations
3.
Bourguignon, Annick, et al.. (2019). Lost in translation? Transferring creativity insights from arts into management. Organization. 27(5). 717–741. 9 indexed citations
4.
Bourguignon, Annick & Françoise Giraud. (2019). Les apports de la « psychologie du contrôle » à la recherche en contrôle de gestion. Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit. Tome 25(3). 9–39. 2 indexed citations
5.
Bourguignon, Annick. (2018). La dynamique des doubles contraintes dans les organisations. Revue française de gestion. 44(270). 143–157. 9 indexed citations
6.
Azambuja, Ricardo & Annick Bourguignon. (2017). Middle-Managers and their Boundary Work: An Ethnographic Study. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2017(1). 11108–11108.
7.
Bourguignon, Annick, et al.. (2013). Subjectivities and micro‐processes of change in accounting practices: a case study. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change. 9(2). 206–236. 5 indexed citations
8.
Bourguignon, Annick. (2012). Getting out of mechanical management: lessons from Chinese thought. 2(1). 3–9. 2 indexed citations
9.
Bourguignon, Annick. (2006). Preface: Creativity in Organizations. International Studies of Management and Organization. 36(1). 3–7. 1 indexed citations
10.
Bourguignon, Annick, et al.. (2004). Changer d'outils de contrôle de gestion ? De la cohérence instrumentale à la cohérence psychologique. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 7(3). 31–61. 9 indexed citations
11.
Bourguignon, Annick & Ève Chiapello. (2004). The role of criticism in the dynamics of performance evaluation systems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 16(6). 665–700. 53 indexed citations
12.
Bourguignon, Annick, et al.. (2004). The American balanced scorecard versus the French tableau de bord: the ideological dimension. Management Accounting Research. 15(2). 107–134. 165 indexed citations
13.
Bourguignon, Annick. (2004). Performance management and management control: evaluated managers' point of view. European Accounting Review. 13(4). 659–687. 14 indexed citations
14.
Bourguignon, Annick. (2004). The American balanced scorecard versus the French tableau de bord: the ideological dimension. Management Accounting Research. 15(2). 107–134. 14 indexed citations
15.
Bourguignon, Annick. (2003). Management accounting and value creation: the profit and loss of reification. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 16(4). 353–389. 53 indexed citations
16.
Bourguignon, Annick. (2003). « Il faut bien que quelque chose change pour que l'essentiel demeure » : la dimension idéologique du « nouveau » contrôle de gestion. Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit. Tome 9(3). 27–53. 16 indexed citations
17.
Bourguignon, Annick, et al.. (2002). L'irréductible dimension culturelle des instruments de gestion : l'exemple du tableau de bord et du balanced scorecard. Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit. Tome 8(3). 7–32. 18 indexed citations
18.
Bourguignon, Annick. (1997). Sous les pavés la plage… ou les multiples fonctions du vocabulaire comptable : l'exemple de la performance. Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit. Tome 3(1). 89–101. 25 indexed citations
19.
Bourguignon, Annick. (1993). Le modèle japonais de gestion. 2 indexed citations
20.
Bourguignon, Annick. (1977). [Status of vampirism and autovampirism].. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 1(2). 181–96. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026