Museum Management and Curatorship

890 papers and 7.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 890 papers published in Museum Management and Curatorship in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Museum Management and Curatorship usually cover Museology (615 papers), Sociology and Political Science (285 papers) and Archeology (193 papers) specifically the topics of Museums and Cultural Heritage (610 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (176 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (173 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Museum Management and Curatorship are Richard Prentice, Paul F. Marty, Richard Sandell, Neil G. Kotler, Barbara J. Soren, Andrea Witcomb, Linda Blud, Philip Kotler, Paulette M. McManus and Graham Black.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Museum Management and Curatorship

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Museum Management and Curatorship. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Museum Management and Curatorship.

Countries where authors publish in Museum Management and Curatorship

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Museum Management and Curatorship. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Museum Management and Curatorship with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Museum Management and Curatorship more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025