Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Conceptualizing management accounting change: an institutional framework
20001.0k citationsJohn Burns, Robert W. ScapensManagement Accounting Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of John Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Burns more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Burns. The network helps show where John Burns may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Burns
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Burns.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Burns based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Burns. John Burns is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Baldvinsdottir, Gudrun, John Burns, Hanne Nørreklit, & Robert W. Scapens. (2008). The Changing Roles and Changing Discourse of the Management Accountant: 1980-2008.4 indexed citations
Burns, John, Mahmoud Ezzamel, & Robert W. Scapens. (2003). The Challenge of Management Accounting Change: behavioural and cultural aspects of change management. Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee).35 indexed citations
14.
Ezzamel, Mahmoud, Robert W. Scapens, & John Burns. (2003). The challenge of management accounting change: behavioural and cultural aspects of management accounting. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff.10 indexed citations
15.
Burns, John, et al.. (2003). The Future Direction of UK Management Accounting Practice. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).43 indexed citations
16.
Burns, John & Juhani Vaivio. (2001). Management Accounting Change. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
17.
Burns, John & Robert W. Scapens. (2000). Conceptualising Management Accounting Change: An Institutional Framework. SSRN Electronic Journal.51 indexed citations
Burns, John, Robert W. Scapens, & William S. Turley. (1996). Some Further Thoughts on the Changing Practice of Management Accounting Practice. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 74(9). 58–60.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.