Mark Hofer

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
70 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Mark Hofer is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Hofer has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Education, 17 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 14 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Mark Hofer's work include Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (15 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (14 papers) and Digital Storytelling and Education (14 papers). Mark Hofer is often cited by papers focused on Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (15 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (14 papers) and Digital Storytelling and Education (14 papers). Mark Hofer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Mark Hofer's co-authors include Judi Harris, Neal Grandgenett, Kathy Swan, Mable B. Kinzie, Barbara Chamberlin, Margaret R. Blanchard, Carl A. Young, Denise Schmidt, Linda S. Levstik and Randy L. Bell and has published in prestigious journals such as Educational Technology & Society, Journal of Research on Technology in Education and Theory & Research in Social Education.

In The Last Decade

Mark Hofer

63 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Ac... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Hofer United States 16 1.0k 349 242 226 152 70 1.3k
Denise Schmidt United States 13 1.3k 1.3× 561 1.6× 257 1.1× 186 0.8× 287 1.9× 32 1.7k
Tae Seob Shin United States 7 1.1k 1.1× 514 1.5× 267 1.1× 164 0.7× 215 1.4× 20 1.5k
Drew Polly United States 24 1.3k 1.3× 331 0.9× 246 1.0× 134 0.6× 168 1.1× 121 1.6k
Craig Peck United States 10 771 0.7× 216 0.6× 178 0.7× 160 0.7× 211 1.4× 21 1.0k
Cathy Ringstaff United States 14 849 0.8× 213 0.6× 257 1.1× 115 0.5× 213 1.4× 28 1.1k
Emine Şendurur Türkiye 7 986 1.0× 481 1.4× 250 1.0× 199 0.9× 324 2.1× 25 1.4k
Polat Şendurur Türkiye 6 981 0.9× 463 1.3× 222 0.9× 193 0.9× 330 2.2× 13 1.4k
Amy Hutchison United States 15 872 0.8× 452 1.3× 266 1.1× 216 1.0× 136 0.9× 56 1.2k
Cassandra Scharber United States 13 536 0.5× 184 0.5× 212 0.9× 122 0.5× 73 0.5× 39 793
Olgun Sadık Türkiye 7 1.0k 1.0× 499 1.4× 225 0.9× 168 0.7× 350 2.3× 16 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Hofer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hofer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hofer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hofer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Hofer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hofer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hofer. The network helps show where Mark Hofer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Hofer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Hofer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Hofer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Hofer. Mark Hofer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hofer, Mark & Judi Harris. (2019). Topics and Sequences in Experienced Teachers’ Instructional Planning: Addressing a ~30-Year Literature Gap. W&M Publish (College of William & Mary). 2443–2452. 4 indexed citations
2.
Hofer, Mark, et al.. (2017). Navigating the Blended Learning Classroom: One Teacher’s Perspective on Designing and Delivering Blended Instruction. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 1434–1442.
3.
Hofer, Mark & Judi Harris. (2016). Open Educational Resources (OERs) for TPACK Development. W&M Publish (College of William & Mary). 2016(1). 2872–2877. 3 indexed citations
4.
Hofer, Mark & Kathy Swan. (2014). Technology and Disciplined Inquiry in the Social Studies. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education. 14(1). 25–30. 5 indexed citations
5.
Harris, Judi, et al.. (2013). Incorporating Knowledge of Students Systematically into TPACK-based Instruction: An Illustration. W&M Publish (College of William & Mary). 2013(1). 5054–5061. 1 indexed citations
6.
Hofer, Mark & Judi Harris. (2012). TPACK Research with Inservice Teachers: Where’s the TCK?. W&M Publish (College of William & Mary). 2012(1). 4704–4709. 14 indexed citations
7.
Harris, Judi, Neal Grandgenett, & Mark Hofer. (2012). Using Structured Interviews to Assess Experienced Teachers’ TPACK. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2012(1). 4696–4703. 9 indexed citations
8.
Swan, Kathy & Mark Hofer. (2011). In Search of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 44(1). 75–98. 28 indexed citations
9.
Harris, Judi, Neal Grandgenett, & Mark Hofer. (2010). Testing a TPACK-Based Technology Integration Assessment Rubric. W&M Publish (College of William & Mary). 2010(1). 3833–3840. 146 indexed citations
10.
Swan, Kathy, et al.. (2010). The Production, Consumption and Distribution of Economic Podcasts. Social Education. 74(3). 148–151. 1 indexed citations
11.
Harris, Judi & Mark Hofer. (2009). Grounded Tech Integration: An Effective Approach Based on Content, Pedagogy, and Teacher Planning.. W&M Publish (College of William & Mary). 37(2). 22–25. 22 indexed citations
12.
Hofer, Mark, et al.. (2009). Trend Alert: A History Teacher's Guide to Using Podcasts in the Classroom.. Social Education. 73(2). 95–102. 6 indexed citations
13.
Harris, Judi & Mark Hofer. (2009). Instructional Planning Activity Types as Vehicles for Curriculum-Based TPACK Development. W&M Publish (College of William & Mary). 2009(1). 4087–4095. 121 indexed citations
14.
Stoddard, Jeremy, et al.. (2008). The "Starving Time" Wikinquiry: Using a Wiki to Foster Historical Inquiry. Social Education. 72(3). 144. 2 indexed citations
15.
Hofer, Mark, et al.. (2007). Camera! Action! Collaborate with Digital Moviemaking. Social studies and the young learner. 19(4). 17–20. 13 indexed citations
16.
Kinzie, Mable B., et al.. (2005). Instructional Uses of Instant Messaging (IM) During Classroom Lectures. Educational Technology & Society. 8(2). 150–160. 31 indexed citations
17.
Hofer, Mark, et al.. (2005). Digital Moviemaking—The Harmonization of Technology, Pedagogy and Content. W&M Publish (College of William & Mary). 1(2). 102–110. 36 indexed citations
18.
Hofer, Mark, et al.. (2004). Fulfilling the Need for a Technology Integration Specialist.. THE journal. 32(3). 34. 20 indexed citations
19.
Bell, Randy L. & Mark Hofer. (2003). The Curry School of Education and Long-Term Commitment to Technology Integration. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education. 3(1). 88–98. 5 indexed citations
20.
Hofer, Mark, et al.. (2002). Preparing Pre-service teachers: How Far Should We Go?. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2002(1). 1338–1339. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026