This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hawkes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hawkes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hawkes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hawkes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hawkes. The network helps show where Mark Hawkes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Hawkes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Hawkes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Hawkes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Hawkes. Mark Hawkes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
El-Gayar, Omar, Mark Moran, & Mark Hawkes. (2011). Students' Acceptance of Tablet PCs and Implications for Educational Institutions. Educational Technology & Society. 14(2). 58–70.116 indexed citations
Hawkes, Mark, et al.. (2003). Supporting and assessing online interactions in higher education. Educational Technology archive. 43(4). 52–56.15 indexed citations
7.
Hawkes, Mark, et al.. (2002). An Analysis of Team vs. Faculty-Based Online Course Development: Implications for Instructional Design. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. 3(4).25 indexed citations
8.
Hawkes, Mark, et al.. (2002). Technology Facilitation in the Rural School: An Analysis of Options.. Journal of Research in Rural Education. 17(3).14 indexed citations
Hawkes, Mark, et al.. (2001). Educational Technology: Identifying the Effects.. Principal leadership. 1(9). 48–51.3 indexed citations
11.
Hawkes, Mark & Alexander J. Romiszowski. (2001). Examining the reflective outcomes of asynchronous computer-mediated communication on inservice teacher development. Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University). 9(2). 285–308.75 indexed citations
12.
Hawkes, Mark, et al.. (2000). The Cost Factor: When Is Interactive Distance Technology Justifiable?.. THE journal. 28(1). 26.7 indexed citations
13.
Hawkes, Mark, et al.. (2000). The Co$t Factor. T.H.E. Journal Technological Horizons in Education. 28(1). 26.1 indexed citations
14.
Hawkes, Mark & Kimberley P. Good. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development Outcomes of a Telecollaborative Technology Curriculum. The rural educator. 21(3). 5–11.9 indexed citations
15.
Hawkes, Mark. (2000). Structuring Computer-Mediated Communication for Collaborative Teacher Development.. Journal of research and development in education. 33(4). 268–277.24 indexed citations
16.
Hawkes, Mark. (1999). Exploring Network-Based Communication in Teacher Professional Development.. Educational Technology archive. 39(4). 45–52.2 indexed citations
17.
McNabb, Mary, et al.. (1999). Computer-Based Technology and Learning: Evolving Uses and Expectations..76 indexed citations
18.
Hawkes, Mark, et al.. (1997). Becoming "First in the World" in Math and Science.. Phi Delta Kappan. 79(1). 30–33.2 indexed citations
19.
Hawkes, Mark, et al.. (1997). Becoming 'First in the World' in Math and Science: Moving High Expectations and Promising Practices to Scale. Phi Delta Kappan. 78(1). 30.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.