Mark Barrow
- Family Practice top 5%
- Research and Theory top 5%
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 15
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 9
- Education top 5%
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices 12
- Higher Education Practises and Engagement 7
- Reflective Practices in Education 5
-
- Innovative Education and Learning Practices 6
-
- Higher Education Governance and Development 6
- Global Educational Policies and Reforms 4
Mark Barrow
52 papers receiving 825 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Family Practice 86
- Research and Theory 31
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 383
- General Health Professions 268
- Education 305
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Barrow
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Barrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Barrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Barrow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Barrow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Barrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Barrow. The network helps show where Mark Barrow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Barrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 7 | A cross-disciplinary assessment of student loans debt, financial support for study and career preferences upon graduation. | 2017 | 6 |
| 8 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 109 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 14 | Educating Educators in the Constructive Use of Technologies for Teaching and Learning | 2010 | 1 |
| 15 | Heroic aspirations: The emergence of academic development in a New Zealand university. | 2010 | 7 |
| 16 | 2010 | 41 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 164 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1977 | 1 |
About Mark Barrow
Mark Barrow is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Education, Emergency Medical Services and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 54 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (15 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (12 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (9 papers), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (7 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (6 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (6 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (5 papers) and Global Educational Policies and Reforms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (86 citations), Research and Theory (31 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (383 citations), General Health Professions (268 citations) and Education (305 citations). Mark Barrow has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include John Hattie, Tzu‐Chieh Yu, Andrew Hill, Judy McKimm, Jennifer Weller, Barbara Grant, Linlin Xu, Phillippa Poole, Deborah Rowe and Elana Curtis. Their work appears in journals such as Higher Education Research & Development, Higher Education, Medical Education, The International Journal for Academic Development and Quality in Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.