Countries where authors publish in Quality in Higher Education
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quality in Higher Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quality in Higher Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality in Higher Education more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Quality in Higher Education
This network shows the impact of papers published in Quality in Higher Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quality in Higher Education.
About Quality in Higher Education
The 702 papers published in Quality in Higher Education in the last decades have received a total of 15.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Quality in Higher Education usually cover Political Science and International Relations (405 papers), Education (435 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (83 papers) specifically the topics of Higher Education Governance and Development (394 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (189 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (180 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (78 papers), Higher Education and Employability (69 papers), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (62 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (52 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quality in Higher Education are Lee Harvey, Jethro Newton, Hamish Coates, Bj⊘rn Stensaker, James Williams, Laurie Lomas, Maureen Tam, Mantz Yorke, Louise Morley and Len Holmes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.