Quality in Higher Education

694 papers and 12.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 694 papers published in Quality in Higher Education in the last decades have received a total of 12.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Quality in Higher Education usually cover Education (432 papers), Political Science and International Relations (400 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (82 papers) specifically the topics of Higher Education Governance and Development (389 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (188 papers) and Higher Education Learning Practices (177 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quality in Higher Education are Lee Harvey, Jethro Newton, Hamish Coates, Bj⊘rn Stensaker, James Williams, Laurie Lomas, Mantz Yorke, Maureen Tam, Len Holmes and Louise Morley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quality in Higher Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quality in Higher Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quality in Higher Education.

Countries where authors publish in Quality in Higher Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quality in Higher Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quality in Higher Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quality in Higher Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025