Mark Balaguer

2.5k citations
44 papers · 877 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Balaguer

40 papers receiving 740 citations

Peers

Mark Balaguer
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Theoretical Computer Science 106
  • History and Philosophy of Science 349
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 459
  • Philosophy 353
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 149
Replace Richard G. Heck with:
Richard G. Heck United States
Jody Azzouni United States
Bob Hale United Kingdom
Michael Detlefsen United States
Mark Wilson United States
Gideon Rosen United States
Hannes Leitgeb Germany
Paul Benacerraf United States
Gila Sher United States
Thomas Hofweber United States
Mark Balaguer relative to Richard G. Heck United States Richard G. Heck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Richard G. Heck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Balaguer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Balaguer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Balaguer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Balaguer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Balaguer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Balaguer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Balaguer. The network helps show where Mark Balaguer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mark Balaguer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Balaguer Line = papers co-authored together Mark Balaguer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2 20176
3
Platonism in Metaphysics
20165
4 20161
5 20154
6 20149
7 20130
8 20133
9 20122
10 20114
11 20098
12 200865
13 200838
14 20052
15 200423
16 20029
17 200281
18 20019
19 19994
20 199620

About Mark Balaguer

Mark Balaguer is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 44 papers that have together received 877 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (25 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (10 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (8 papers), Free Will and Agency (6 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (5 papers), Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (5 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (106 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (349 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (459 citations), Philosophy (353 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (149 citations). Mark Balaguer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Matthew McGrath, Stewart Shapiro, J.B. Roldán, F. Gámiz, A. Godoy, Benjamı́n Iñı́guez, Mary Leng, John P. Burgess, Luca Donetti and Terry Horgan. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Philosophia Mathematica, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Solid-State Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026