Paul Benacerraf
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.2%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 2%
- Theoretical Computer Science top 0.2%
- Topics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers)Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (3 papers)Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Theoretical Computer ScienceHistory and Philosophy of ScienceExperimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Paul Benacerraf
11 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 684
- History and Philosophy of Science 515
- Philosophy 395
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 277
- Theoretical Computer Science 220
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Benacerraf
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Benacerraf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Benacerraf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Benacerraf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Benacerraf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Benacerraf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Benacerraf. The network helps show where Paul Benacerraf may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Benacerraf
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Benacerraf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Benacerraf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Benacerraf. Paul Benacerraf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carl Gustav Hempel 1905-1997 | 0 |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 287 | |
| 5 | Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings (2nd Edition) | 40 |
| 6 | Philosophy of Mathematics Selected Readings /Edited by Paul Benacerraf, Hilary Putnam. --. -- | 12 |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | Mathematical Truthbreakdown → | 336 |
| 10 | Budgeting and Resource Allocation at Princeton University. Report of a Demonstration Project. | 1 |
| 11 | 71 | |
| 12 | What Numbers Could not Bebreakdown → | 357 |
| 13 | 61 |
About Paul Benacerraf
Paul Benacerraf is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Mathematical Physics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (3 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (3 papers) and Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (220 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (515 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (684 citations). Paul Benacerraf has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Hilary Putnam, Crispin Wright, Gerald E. Sacks and Richard C. Jeffrey. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Journal of Symbolic Logic.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.