Christopher Pincock

1.1k citations
37 papers · 544 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Pincock

32 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Christopher Pincock
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • History and Philosophy of Science 427
  • Theoretical Computer Science 43
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 135
  • Philosophy 107
  • Global and Planetary Change 95
Replace Juha Saatsi with:
Juha Saatsi United Kingdom
Mark Wilson United States
James W. McAllister Netherlands
C. Ulises Moulines Germany
Anjan Chakravartty United States
Daniel Gärber United States
Darrell P. Rowbottom United Kingdom
Chris Swoyer United States
Alexander Reutlinger Germany
Erik Weber Belgium
Christopher Pincock relative to Juha Saatsi United Kingdom Juha Saatsi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Juha Saatsi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Pincock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Pincock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Pincock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Pincock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Pincock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Pincock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Pincock. The network helps show where Christopher Pincock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Pincock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Pincock Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Pincock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 202312
3 20213
4 20211
5 20182
6 20173
7
The Unsolvability of The Quintic: A Case Study in Abstract Mathematical Explanation
201519
8 20130
9 201168
10 20100
11 20098
12 20092
13 20087
14 200784
15 20060
16 20051
17 20053
18 20053
19 200518
20 200425

About Christopher Pincock

Christopher Pincock is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Theoretical Computer Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 37 papers that have together received 544 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (28 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (7 papers), Science and Climate Studies (5 papers), Climate variability and models (2 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (2 papers) and History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (427 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (43 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (135 citations), Philosophy (107 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (95 citations). Christopher Pincock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Paseau, Mary Leng, Alan R. H. Baker, Elaine Landry, Sorin Bangu and Mark Balaguer. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Synthese, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Russell the Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies and Metascience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026