Stewart Shapiro
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Hematology top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mark BalaguerJack LazersonCampbell W. McMillanJoseph C. FratantoniEdsonL. M. AledortM W Hilgartnervan Eys J
- Topics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers)Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers)Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMyanmarGermany
In The Last Decade
Stewart Shapiro
43 papers receiving 826 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 259
- Hematology 242
- History and Philosophy of Science 166
- Philosophy 143
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 133
Countries citing papers authored by Stewart Shapiro
This map shows the geographic impact of Stewart Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stewart Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stewart Shapiro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stewart Shapiro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stewart Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stewart Shapiro. The network helps show where Stewart Shapiro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stewart Shapiro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stewart Shapiro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stewart Shapiro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stewart Shapiro. Stewart Shapiro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The History of Continua: Philosophical and Mathematical Perspectives | 5 |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | 81 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | The Place of Confluent Education in the Human Potential Movement: A Historical Perspective | 4 |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | A discussion of alveolar bone physiology relative to implants for the elderly. | 2 |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Stewart Shapiro
Stewart Shapiro is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Theoretical Computer Science and General Psychology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 966 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (4 papers) and Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (97 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (166 citations) and Hematology (242 citations). Stewart Shapiro has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Myanmar and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mark Balaguer, Jack Lazerson, Campbell W. McMillan, Joseph C. Fratantoni, Edson, L. M. Aledort, M W Hilgartner, van Eys J, Kasper Ck and P. A. Levine. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, Journal of Dental Research and The Philosophical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.