Matthew McGrath

40 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Knowledge in an Uncertain World20092026201420202009100200300400

Peers

Matthew McGrath
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Philosophy 1.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 937
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 639
  • Sociology and Political Science 286
  • History and Philosophy of Science 259
Replace John Hawthorne with:
John Hawthorne United States
Herman Cappelen United States
Berit Brogaard United States
Gareth Evans United Kingdom
John MacFarlane United States
Roy Sorensen United States
Ernest Lepore United States
Barbara Gail Montero United States
Barry Stroud United States
Stephen Yablo United States
Matthew McGrath relative to John Hawthorne United States John Hawthorne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
John Hawthorne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew McGrath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew McGrath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew McGrath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew McGrath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew McGrath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew McGrath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew McGrath. The network helps show where Matthew McGrath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew McGrath

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew McGrath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew McGrath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew McGrath. Matthew McGrath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 2
3 2
4 22
5 5
6 6
7 11
8
Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction
17
9 18
10 4
11 4
12 6
13 32
14 6
15 122
16
Review of John Hawthorne, Knowledge and Lotteries
1
17 1
18 24
19 11
20 112

About Matthew McGrath

Matthew McGrath is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (31 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (26 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (1.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (937 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (259 citations). Matthew McGrath has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Fantl, Quentin Summerfield, Mark Balaguer, Alvin I. Goldman, Juan Comesaña, Ernest Sosa, Jaegwon Kim and John R. Foster. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, The Philosophical Review and The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026