Thomas Hofweber
Impact in
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy, Science, and History
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 9
- Philosophy, Science, and History 4
- Co-authors
- Anthony EverettGideon RosenJohn P. BurgessJ. David VellemanMarc LangeRebecca L. WalkerRalf Schindler
- Journals
- Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (4 papers)The Philosophical Review (3 papers)Noûs (3 papers)Analysis (2 papers)Res Philosophica (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas Hofweber
33 papers receiving 493 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- History and Philosophy of Science 242
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 407
- Theoretical Computer Science 32
- Philosophy 298
- Language and Linguistics 50
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hofweber
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hofweber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hofweber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hofweber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hofweber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hofweber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hofweber. The network helps show where Thomas Hofweber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Hofweber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 5 | Fragmentalism and special relativity | 2020 | 1 |
| 6 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 62 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 29 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 56 | |
| 20 | Empty Names, Fiction, and the Puzzles of Non-Existence | 2000 | 121 |
About Thomas Hofweber
Thomas Hofweber is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Theoretical Computer Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Health Informatics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (21 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (4 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (4 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (242 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (407 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (32 citations), Philosophy (298 citations) and Language and Linguistics (50 citations). Thomas Hofweber has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Everett, Gideon Rosen, John P. Burgess, J. David Velleman, Marc Lange, Rebecca L. Walker and Ralf Schindler. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The Philosophical Review, Noûs, Analysis and Res Philosophica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.