Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Feedback : all that effort, but what is the effect?
2010483 citationsMargaret Price, Karen Handley et al.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Educationprofile →
Feedback: focusing attention on engagement
2011291 citationsMargaret Price, Karen Handley et al.Studies in Higher Educationprofile →
The Bodymind Problem and the Possibilities of Pain
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Price
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Price's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Price with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Price more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Price. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Price. The network helps show where Margaret Price may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Price
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Price.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Price based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Price. Margaret Price is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kerschbaum, Stephanie L. & Margaret Price. (2017). Centering Disability in Qualitative Interviewing. Research in the Teaching of English. 52(1). 98.9 indexed citations
6.
Price, Margaret. (2017). What is a Service Animal? A Careful Rethinking. ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa). 13(4).8 indexed citations
Dolmage, Jay, et al.. (2014). Where We Are: Disability and Accessibility--Moving beyond Disability 2.0 in Composition Studies.. Freshman English news. 42(2). 147–150.3 indexed citations
11.
Oswal, Sushil K., Stephanie L. Kerschbaum, Rosemarie Garland‐Thomson, et al.. (2013). Faculty Members, Accommodation, and Access in Higher Education. Profession.4 indexed citations
Price, Margaret. (2000). Negotiating Boundaries, Regenerating Ruins: The 'Secret Spaces of Childhood' Exhibition. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 39(2). 248.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.