Michele T. Cole

621 total citations · 1 hit paper
16 papers, 363 citations indexed

About

Michele T. Cole is a scholar working on Safety Research, Education and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Michele T. Cole has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 363 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Safety Research, 5 papers in Education and 4 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Michele T. Cole's work include Academic integrity and plagiarism (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers). Michele T. Cole is often cited by papers focused on Academic integrity and plagiarism (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (5 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (4 papers). Michele T. Cole collaborates with scholars based in United States. Michele T. Cole's co-authors include Louis B. Swartz, Daniel J. Shelley and Jill K. Maher and has published in prestigious journals such as The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Nonprofit Management and Leadership and Public Performance & Management Review.

In The Last Decade

Michele T. Cole

15 papers receiving 318 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study

2014 264 citations Michele T. Cole, Daniel J. Shelley et al. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning profile →

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Michele T. Cole	246	86	66	53	48	16	363
Teklu Abate Bekele	303 1.2×	101 1.2×	71 1.1×	22 0.4×	40 0.8×	18	404
Justine Ferrer	135 0.5×	53 0.6×	57 0.9×	30 0.6×	52 1.1×	13	271
Kaye Shelton	281 1.1×	96 1.1×	72 1.1×	28 0.5×	48 1.0×	23	402
Nikolaus T. Butz	202 0.8×	74 0.9×	45 0.7×	41 0.8×	110 2.3×	16	340
Allison Ringer	130 0.5×	53 0.6×	55 0.8×	24 0.5×	47 1.0×	14	270
Gayani Samarawickrema	491 2.0×	77 0.9×	68 1.0×	31 0.6×	47 1.0×	30	610
Chi‐Sing Li	193 0.8×	57 0.7×	43 0.7×	45 0.8×	77 1.6×	18	323
Rebecca Croxton	197 0.8×	56 0.7×	107 1.6×	24 0.5×	38 0.8×	21	362
Huei-Chuan Wei	366 1.5×	121 1.4×	111 1.7×	76 1.4×	44 0.9×	6	492
Jorge Gaytan	411 1.7×	120 1.4×	68 1.0×	25 0.5×	70 1.5×	19	501

Countries citing papers authored by Michele T. Cole

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michele T. Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michele T. Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michele T. Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michele T. Cole

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michele T. Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michele T. Cole. The network helps show where Michele T. Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michele T. Cole

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michele T. Cole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michele T. Cole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michele T. Cole. Michele T. Cole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

Cole, Michele T. & Louis B. Swartz. (2019). Can Instructors Use Social Media to Enhance Learning in a Smart Course Room and Foster a Culture of Academic Integrity?. 13. 1429–1432. 1 indexed citations

Cole, Michele T., Louis B. Swartz, & Daniel J. Shelley. (2019). Threaded Discussion. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education. 16(1). 16–29. 6 indexed citations

Cole, Michele T., Daniel J. Shelley, & Louis B. Swartz. (2017). FORMATTING THREADED DISCUSSIONS FOR ENHANCED E-LEARNING: EXPLORING BEST PRACTICES. EDULEARN proceedings. 1. 7220–7225. 1 indexed citations

Shelley, Daniel J., Michele T. Cole, & Louis B. Swartz. (2014). University Students and E-Learning: Are they really satisfied?. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2014(1). 2186–2195. 1 indexed citations

Cole, Michele T., Louis B. Swartz, & Daniel J. Shelley. (2014). Students’ Use of Technology in Learning Course Material. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education. 10(1). 35–48. 4 indexed citations

Cole, Michele T., Daniel J. Shelley, & Louis B. Swartz. (2014). Online instruction, e-learning, and student satisfaction: A three year study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 15(6). 264 indexed citations breakdown →

Swartz, Louis B. & Michele T. Cole. (2013). Students' Perception of Academic Integrity in Online Business Education Courses. 4(1). 102. 9 indexed citations

Cole, Michele T., et al.. (2013). UNDERSTANDING ACADEMIC INTEGRITY IN THE ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT: A SURVEY OF GRADUATE AND UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS STUDENTS. 7 indexed citations

Cole, Michele T., Daniel J. Shelley, & Louis B. Swartz. (2011). Satisfaction with Online Education and Issues of Academic Integrity: Viewed from the Student's Perspective. 1 indexed citations

10.

Shelley, Daniel J., Louis B. Swartz, & Michele T. Cole. (2010). Students’ Perceptions of Academic Integrity in the Online Learning Environment. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2010(1). 2165–2175. 1 indexed citations

11.

Shelley, Daniel J., Louis B. Swartz, & Michele T. Cole. (2008). Online vs. In-Class Teaching: Comparing and Analyzing Effectiveness. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2008(1). 724–731. 3 indexed citations

12.

Shelley, Daniel J., Louis B. Swartz, & Michele T. Cole. (2008). Learning Business Law Online vs. Onland. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education. 4(2). 54–66. 4 indexed citations

13.

Maher, Jill K., et al.. (2008). Managing Nonprofit Organizations: The Importance of Transformational Leadership and Commitment to Operating Standards for Nonprofit Accountability. Public Performance & Management Review. 32(1). 51–75. 27 indexed citations

14.

Cole, Michele T., et al.. (2007). Self-efficacy and interdependence as predictors of life satisfaction for people with disabilities: Implications for independent living programs. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 27(3). 153–161. 14 indexed citations

15.

Shelley, Daniel J., Louis B. Swartz, & Michele T. Cole. (2007). A Comparative Analysis of Online and Traditional Undergraduate Business Law Classes. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education. 3(1). 10–21. 18 indexed citations

16.

Cole, Michele T.. (1994). Is there a third way? a comparative analysis of how the law treats workers in the nonprofit, private‐for‐profit, and public sectors. Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 5(2). 197–211. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact