590 total citations 19 papers, 359 citations indexed
About
Lori Holcomb is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Communication.
According to data from OpenAlex, Lori Holcomb has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 359 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Education, 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Lori Holcomb's work include Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (5 papers). Lori Holcomb is often cited by papers focused on Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (5 papers). Lori Holcomb collaborates with scholars based in United States. Lori Holcomb's co-authors include Bethany Smith, Kevin P. Brady, Scott W. Brown, Frederick B. King, Jill Castek, Kevin Oliver, John Lee, Amanda Robertson, Jonna M. Kulikowich and Jason A. Osborne and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cardiac Surgery, Kappa Delta Pi Record and Social Studies Research and Practice.
Citations per year, relative to Lori Holcomb Lori Holcomb (= 1×)
peers
C. Michael Elavsky
Countries citing papers authored by Lori Holcomb
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Lori Holcomb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lori Holcomb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lori Holcomb more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lori Holcomb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lori Holcomb. The network helps show where Lori Holcomb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lori Holcomb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lori Holcomb.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lori Holcomb based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lori Holcomb. Lori Holcomb is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Holcomb, Lori, et al.. (2012). Utilizing Web 2.0 Tools to Redesign and Support Communities of Practice in a Distance Education Course. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2012(1). 406–411.1 indexed citations
2.
Holcomb, Lori, et al.. (2012). Computer technology, student achievement, and equity: a multilevel analysis of the relationship between high school students' use of computers, gender, and mathematics achievement. 1–183.1 indexed citations
Holcomb, Lori, Kevin P. Brady, & Bethany Smith. (2010). Ning in Education: Can non-commercial, education-based social networking sites really address the privacy and safety concerns of educators?. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2010(1). 528–531.4 indexed citations
6.
Brady, Kevin P., Lori Holcomb, & Bethany Smith. (2010). The Use of Alternative Social Networking Sites in Higher Educational Settings: A Case Study of the E-Learning Benefits of Ning in Education. 9(2). 151–170.224 indexed citations
7.
Holcomb, Lori, et al.. (2010). The Emergence of "Educational Networking": Can Non-commercial, Education-based Social Networking Sites Really Address the Privacy and Safety Concerns of Educators?.7 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Bethany & Lori Holcomb. (2009). The “Walled Garden” approach to Social Networking: Utilizing Ning in distance education.. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2009(1). 2970–2973.3 indexed citations
9.
Holcomb, Lori, Kevin P. Brady, & Bethany Smith. (2009). Using social networking tools in educational settings: Student attitudes and perceptions of NING. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2009(1). 2551–2553.1 indexed citations
Holcomb, Lori, et al.. (2008). Using Web 2.0 to Support Learning in the Social Studies Context. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2008(1). 4897–4900.1 indexed citations
13.
Oliver, Kevin & Lori Holcomb. (2008). Changes in Student Technology Use and Skill in the First Year of a 1-to-1 Computing Program. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2008(1). 2154–2160.1 indexed citations
14.
Oliver, Kevin, et al.. (2008). Teacher and Student Reactions to a New Statewide Virtual Public School. 2008(1). 601–608.
15.
Holcomb, Lori, et al.. (2007). Unlocking the Potential of K-12 Classroom Websites to Enhance Learning. 43(1). 36.6 indexed citations
16.
Holcomb, Lori, et al.. (2005). Teachers' Perception of Their Classroom Technological Resources and the Perceived Feasibility of Implementation of Their Connecticut Teacher Technology Competencies: Level II Proposals. 2005(1).3 indexed citations
17.
Holcomb, Lori, et al.. (2004). Assessing Educational Technology Knowledge with a Problem-based. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2004(1). 2008–2013.1 indexed citations
18.
Holcomb, Lori, Frederick B. King, & Scott W. Brown. (2004). Student Traits and Attributes Contributing to Success in Online Courses: Evaluation of University Online Courses. 2(3).45 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.