Lori Andersen

441 total citations
10 papers, 303 citations indexed

About

Lori Andersen is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Lori Andersen has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 303 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Lori Andersen's work include Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers), Career Development and Diversity (2 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers). Lori Andersen is often cited by papers focused on Reflective Practices in Education (2 papers), Career Development and Diversity (2 papers) and Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (2 papers). Lori Andersen collaborates with scholars based in United States and Russia. Lori Andersen's co-authors include Thomas J. Ward, Jason Chen, Tracy L. Cross, Juanita Jo Matkins, Sakhavat Mammadov, Jennifer Riedl Cross and Brooke Nash and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Science Education and journal for the education of the gifted.

In The Last Decade

Lori Andersen

9 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lori Andersen United States	6	168	154	121	61	48	10	303
James Concannon United States	11	194 1.2×	74 0.5×	133 1.1×	49 0.8×	67 1.4×	28	367
Carolyn Walker Hopp United States	2	226 1.3×	287 1.9×	74 0.6×	127 2.1×	36 0.8×	4	439
Cara Cahalan United States	7	165 1.0×	78 0.5×	35 0.3×	21 0.3×	71 1.5×	11	324
Joan Daniels Pedro United States	7	196 1.2×	174 1.1×	61 0.5×	42 0.7×	55 1.1×	9	361
Ann DeVaney Becker United States	7	163 1.0×	172 1.1×	46 0.4×	36 0.6×	56 1.2×	10	331
Mica Hutchison United States	3	120 0.7×	51 0.3×	111 0.9×	43 0.7×	38 0.8×	9	310
Jeanne H. Purcell United States	10	235 1.4×	179 1.2×	53 0.4×	36 0.6×	52 1.1×	20	332
Sandra N. Kaplan United States	9	187 1.1×	120 0.8×	30 0.2×	32 0.5×	66 1.4×	49	330
Marlynn M. Griffin United States	8	158 0.9×	37 0.2×	21 0.2×	36 0.6×	146 3.0×	17	303
D. Craig Schroeder United States	4	201 1.2×	51 0.3×	97 0.8×	40 0.7×	64 1.3×	5	342

Countries citing papers authored by Lori Andersen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lori Andersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lori Andersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lori Andersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lori Andersen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lori Andersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lori Andersen. The network helps show where Lori Andersen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lori Andersen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lori Andersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lori Andersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lori Andersen. Lori Andersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Cross, Tracy L., et al.. (2018). Psychological Heterogeneity Among Honors College Students. journal for the education of the gifted. 41(3). 242–272. 18 indexed citations

Andersen, Lori, et al.. (2018). Articulating the validity evidence for a science alternate assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 55(6). 826–848. 1 indexed citations

Andersen, Lori & Brooke Nash. (2016). Making Science Accessible to Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities. RIT Scholar Works (Rochester Institute of Technology). 19(1). 17–38. 4 indexed citations

Andersen, Lori & Jason Chen. (2015). Do High-Ability Students Disidentify With Science? A Descriptive Study of U.S. Ninth Graders in 2009. Science Education. 100(1). 57–77. 36 indexed citations

Andersen, Lori & Tracy L. Cross. (2014). Are Students With High Ability in Math More Motivated in Math and Science Than Other Students?. Roeper Review. 36(4). 221–234. 24 indexed citations

Andersen, Lori. (2014). Visual–Spatial Ability: Important in STEM, Ignored in Gifted Education. Roeper Review. 36(2). 114–121. 50 indexed citations

Andersen, Lori & Thomas J. Ward. (2013). Expectancy‐Value Models for the STEM Persistence Plans of Ninth‐Grade, High‐Ability Students: A Comparison Between Black, Hispanic, and White Students. Science Education. 98(2). 216–242. 157 indexed citations

Andersen, Lori. (2013). Creating Innovators: The Making of Young People Who Will Change The World.Wagner, T (2012). Roeper Review. 35(3). 205–206.

Andersen, Lori. (2011). Podcasting, Cognitive Theory, and Really Simple Syndication: What is the potential impact when used together?. Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia. 20(3). 219–234. 5 indexed citations

10.

Andersen, Lori & Juanita Jo Matkins. (2011). Web 2.0 Tools and the Reflections of Preservice Secondary Science Teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. 28(1). 27–38. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact