Brooke Nash

637 total citations
10 papers, 299 citations indexed

About

Brooke Nash is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems and Management and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Brooke Nash has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 299 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Education, 3 papers in Information Systems and Management and 3 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Brooke Nash's work include Student Assessment and Feedback (4 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (3 papers) and Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (3 papers). Brooke Nash is often cited by papers focused on Student Assessment and Feedback (4 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (3 papers) and Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (3 papers). Brooke Nash collaborates with scholars based in United States. Brooke Nash's co-authors include Neal M. Kingston, Meagan Karvonen, Lori Andersen and Lori Anderson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Journal of Educational Measurement and Educational Measurement Issues and Practice.

In The Last Decade

Brooke Nash

8 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Brooke Nash United States	5	247	94	89	25	18	10	299
Christine J. Lyon United States	7	319 1.3×	60 0.6×	95 1.1×	18 0.7×	22 1.2×	11	354
Connie M. Moss United States	7	211 0.9×	65 0.7×	32 0.4×	15 0.6×	25 1.4×	17	249
Jonathan Bostic United States	11	282 1.1×	92 1.0×	24 0.3×	38 1.5×	10 0.6×	44	354
Jennifer Knudsen United States	7	234 0.9×	86 0.9×	21 0.2×	33 1.3×	20 1.1×	13	288
Jessica To Hong Kong	9	263 1.1×	75 0.8×	15 0.2×	27 1.1×	15 0.8×	14	298
Victoria Robison United States	12	208 0.8×	65 0.7×	59 0.7×	12 0.5×	16 0.9×	24	291
Maryam Alqassab Netherlands	7	282 1.1×	101 1.1×	10 0.1×	46 1.8×	35 1.9×	12	354
Marnie Thompson United States	6	223 0.9×	48 0.5×	58 0.7×	9 0.4×	15 0.8×	8	241
Michelle Cirillo United States	12	310 1.3×	115 1.2×	23 0.3×	24 1.0×	17 0.9×	33	376
Catarina Andersson Sweden	7	253 1.0×	54 0.6×	55 0.6×	11 0.4×	42 2.3×	23	291

Countries citing papers authored by Brooke Nash

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brooke Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brooke Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brooke Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brooke Nash

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brooke Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brooke Nash. The network helps show where Brooke Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brooke Nash

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brooke Nash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brooke Nash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brooke Nash. Brooke Nash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Nash, Brooke, et al.. (2023). Using Simulated Retests to Estimate the Reliability of Diagnostic Assessment Systems. Journal of Educational Measurement. 60(3). 455–475.

2.

Nash, Brooke, et al.. (2022). A Diagnostic Framework for the Empirical Evaluation of Learning Maps. Frontiers in Education. 6. 2 indexed citations

3.

Nash, Brooke, et al.. (2022). Teacher Assessment Literacy: Implications for Diagnostic Assessment Systems. Applied Measurement in Education. 35(1). 17–32. 5 indexed citations

4.

Nash, Brooke, et al.. (2019). Measuring the Reliability of Diagnostic Mastery Classifications at Multiple Levels of Reporting. Applied Measurement in Education. 32(4). 298–309. 4 indexed citations

5.

Andersen, Lori, et al.. (2018). Articulating the validity evidence for a science alternate assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 55(6). 826–848. 1 indexed citations

6.

Nash, Brooke, et al.. (2017). Condensed Mastery Profile Method for Setting Standards for Diagnostic Assessment Systems. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice. 36(4). 5–15. 6 indexed citations

7.

Andersen, Lori & Brooke Nash. (2016). Making Science Accessible to Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities. RIT Scholar Works (Rochester Institute of Technology). 19(1). 17–38. 4 indexed citations

8.

Anderson, Lori & Brooke Nash. (2016). Making Science Accessible to Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities. 19(1). 17–33.

9.

Kingston, Neal M. & Brooke Nash. (2012). How Many Formative Assessment Angels Can Dance on the Head of a Meta‐Analytic Pin: .2. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice. 31(4). 18–19. 6 indexed citations

10.

Kingston, Neal M. & Brooke Nash. (2011). Formative Assessment: A Meta-Analysis and a Call for Research. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice. 30(4). 28–37. 271 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact