Laura Terry
- Education top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Information Systems top 10%
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Kristen KereluikPunya MishraL. Lee GlennW. BenensonBrian W. O’SheaGavin Taylor‐StokesMegan O’BrienAshish V. Joshi
- Topics
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers)Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers)Online and Blended Learning (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBMC Infectious DiseasesCBE—Life Sciences Education
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Laura Terry
8 papers receiving 256 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Education 206
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 58
- Information Systems 53
- Computer Science Applications 31
- Sociology and Political Science 28
Countries citing papers authored by Laura Terry
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura Terry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura Terry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura Terry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laura Terry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura Terry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura Terry. The network helps show where Laura Terry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura Terry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura Terry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura Terry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura Terry. Laura Terry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | Benefits of Recording and Sharing Instructor-Created Videos in Online Classes | 1 |
| 3 | Interdisciplinary Professional Learning Communities: Support for Faculty Teaching Blended Learning. | 3 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | What Knowledge Is of Most Worthbreakdown → | 247 |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | What would John Dewey do: Programmatic design for developing TPACK for 21st century learning | 2 |
| 9 | 18 |
About Laura Terry
Laura Terry is a scholar working on Research and Theory, General Psychology and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 9 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (206 citations), Research and Theory (6 citations) and Computer Science Applications (31 citations). Laura Terry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Kristen Kereluik, Punya Mishra, L. Lee Glenn, W. Benenson, Brian W. O’Shea, Gavin Taylor‐Stokes, Megan O’Brien, Ashish V. Joshi, Fanny S Mitrani-Gold and Danah Henriksen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BMC Infectious Diseases and CBE—Life Sciences Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.