Edd Pitt

866 total citations
22 papers, 505 citations indexed

About

Edd Pitt is a scholar working on Education, Management Science and Operations Research and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Edd Pitt has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 505 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Education, 3 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Edd Pitt's work include Student Assessment and Feedback (17 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (14 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (9 papers). Edd Pitt is often cited by papers focused on Student Assessment and Feedback (17 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (14 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (9 papers). Edd Pitt collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Edd Pitt's co-authors include Lin Norton, Naomi Winstone, Margaret Bearman, Rachelle Esterhazy, Kathleen M. Quinlan, Robert A. Nash, David Carless, Marion Heron, Evgenios Evgeniou and Emma Medland and has published in prestigious journals such as Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Burns and Higher Education Research & Development.

In The Last Decade

Edd Pitt

19 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Edd Pitt United Kingdom	11	404	87	48	41	34	22	505
Ulemu Luhanga United States	9	351 0.9×	49 0.6×	40 0.8×	42 1.0×	23 0.7×	16	446
Alison Elliot United Kingdom	5	303 0.8×	96 1.1×	41 0.9×	24 0.6×	25 0.7×	11	441
Maryam Asoodar Netherlands	8	150 0.4×	61 0.7×	12 0.3×	28 0.7×	20 0.6×	23	265
Betty McDonald Trinidad and Tobago	6	270 0.7×	57 0.7×	35 0.7×	15 0.4×	20 0.6×	24	327
Kathleen T. Brinko United States	10	446 1.1×	84 1.0×	66 1.4×	15 0.4×	17 0.5×	21	560
Magdeleine Lew Singapore	4	229 0.6×	72 0.8×	43 0.9×	14 0.3×	21 0.6×	6	319
Deidre M. Le Fevre New Zealand	9	250 0.6×	83 1.0×	32 0.7×	9 0.2×	7 0.2×	13	428
Megan Yih Chyn A. Kek Australia	11	429 1.1×	78 0.9×	48 1.0×	6 0.1×	4 0.1×	29	530
Chi Cheung Ruby Yang Hong Kong	13	233 0.6×	61 0.7×	30 0.6×	52 1.3×	55 1.6×	23	355
Rebeca Soler Spain	4	283 0.7×	37 0.4×	24 0.5×	14 0.3×	8 0.2×	6	359

Countries citing papers authored by Edd Pitt

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edd Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edd Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edd Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edd Pitt

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edd Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edd Pitt. The network helps show where Edd Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edd Pitt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edd Pitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edd Pitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edd Pitt. Edd Pitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Winstone, Naomi & Edd Pitt. (2025). Approaches to feedback on examination performance: research, policy, and practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 50(6). 876–896.

Rasooli, Amirhossein, et al.. (2025). Understanding students’ perceptions of fairness in group work assessment: key conditions and implications. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 50(7). 1012–1024.

Rasooli, Amirhossein, et al.. (2024). Students’ perceptions of fairness in groupwork assessment: validity evidence for peer assessment fairness instrument. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 50(1). 111–126. 2 indexed citations

Quinlan, Kathleen M. & Edd Pitt. (2024). Evaluative feedback isn’t enough: harnessing the power of consequential feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 50(4). 577–591.

Elkington, Sam, et al.. (2023). Lessons learned from enabling large-scale assessment change: a collaborative autoethnographic study. Higher Education Research & Development. 43(4). 844–858. 3 indexed citations

Pitt, Edd & Naomi Winstone. (2022). Enabling and valuing feedback literacies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 48(2). 149–157. 10 indexed citations

Pitt, Edd, et al.. (2021). Feedback cultures, histories and literacies: international postgraduate students’ experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 47(3). 347–359. 27 indexed citations

Pitt, Edd & David Carless. (2021). Signature feedback practices in the creative arts: integrating feedback within the curriculum. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 47(6). 817–829. 19 indexed citations

Heron, Marion, Emma Medland, Naomi Winstone, & Edd Pitt. (2021). Developing the relational in teacher feedback literacy: exploring feedback talk. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 48(2). 172–185. 30 indexed citations

10.

Quinlan, Kathleen M. & Edd Pitt. (2021). Towards signature assessment and feedback practices: a taxonomy of discipline-specific elements of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice. 28(2). 191–207. 27 indexed citations

11.

Pitt, Edd, et al.. (2021). Exploring intercultural dialogic interactions between individuals with diverse feedback literacies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 47(7). 1057–1070. 9 indexed citations

12.

Winstone, Naomi, Edd Pitt, & Robert A. Nash. (2020). Educators’ perceptions of responsibility-sharing in feedback processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 46(1). 118–131. 37 indexed citations

13.

Pitt, Edd, Margaret Bearman, & Rachelle Esterhazy. (2019). The conundrum of low achievement and feedback for learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 45(2). 239–250. 47 indexed citations

14.

Pitt, Edd & Naomi Winstone. (2018). The impact of anonymous marking on students’ perceptions of fairness, feedback and relationships with lecturers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 43(7). 1183–1193. 31 indexed citations

15.

Pitt, Edd & Naomi Winstone. (2017). Feedback is a two-way street. So why does the NSS only look one way?. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 5 indexed citations

16.

Evgeniou, Evgenios, et al.. (2016). High fidelity, low cost moulage as a valid simulation tool to improve burns education. Burns. 42(4). 844–852. 38 indexed citations

17.

Pitt, Edd & Lin Norton. (2016). ‘Now that’s the feedback I want!’ Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 42(4). 499–516. 153 indexed citations

18.

Wakefield, Caroline, et al.. (2013). Feeding forward from summative assessment: the Essay Feedback Checklist as a learning tool. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 39(2). 253–262. 17 indexed citations

19.

Pitt, Edd, et al.. (2010). Students’ approaches to study, conceptions of learning and judgements about the value of networked technologies. Active Learning in Higher Education. 11(1). 55–65. 44 indexed citations

20.

Norton, Lin, Edd Pitt, Kathy Harrington, James Elander, & Peter Reddy. (2009). Writing Essays at University: A guide for students, by students. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact