Keith Jones

20.9k total citations · 4 hit papers
324 papers, 10.9k citations indexed

About

Keith Jones is a scholar working on Education, Statistics and Probability and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Keith Jones has authored 324 papers receiving a total of 10.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 126 papers in Education, 50 papers in Statistics and Probability and 43 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Keith Jones's work include Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (100 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (46 papers) and Education and Technology Integration (28 papers). Keith Jones is often cited by papers focused on Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (100 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (46 papers) and Education and Technology Integration (28 papers). Keith Jones collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Keith Jones's co-authors include Taro Fujita, Michael H. Shapero, Guoying Liu, P. Spanne, W. Brent Lindquist, Giulia C. Kennedy, Jing Huang, David A. Coker, Hiroyuki Aburatani and Stephen J. Peroutka and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Cell and The Lancet.

In The Last Decade

Keith Jones

290 papers receiving 10.2k citations

Hit Papers

Botanical Histochemistry 1964 2026 1984 2005 1964 2006 2014 1996 400 800 1.2k

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Keith Jones 3.9k 2.5k 1.6k 1.4k 1.3k 324 10.9k
W. J. Dixon 2.2k 0.6× 774 0.3× 709 0.4× 273 0.2× 325 0.2× 87 18.1k
Martin Krzywinski 7.3k 1.9× 1.8k 0.7× 3.6k 2.3× 69 0.0× 955 0.7× 119 17.8k
Peter H. Westfall 2.7k 0.7× 2.1k 0.9× 2.8k 1.8× 177 0.1× 270 0.2× 94 18.9k
Andreas Ziegler 4.9k 1.2× 3.1k 1.2× 388 0.2× 133 0.1× 1.1k 0.8× 583 23.4k
Robert W. Williams 11.6k 3.0× 4.2k 1.7× 1.4k 0.9× 83 0.1× 1.2k 0.9× 564 24.0k
Ross Ihaka 3.0k 0.8× 1.6k 0.6× 1.2k 0.8× 64 0.0× 404 0.3× 18 12.2k
Cedric E. Ginestet 2.1k 0.5× 905 0.4× 1.3k 0.8× 84 0.1× 304 0.2× 31 11.5k
Olive Jean Dunn 1.1k 0.3× 605 0.2× 550 0.3× 289 0.2× 228 0.2× 65 12.0k
Yudi Pawitan 5.4k 1.4× 3.0k 1.2× 323 0.2× 82 0.1× 2.4k 1.8× 231 14.3k
Toru Takumi 7.5k 1.9× 2.1k 0.8× 1.8k 1.1× 79 0.1× 621 0.5× 178 22.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Keith Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Keith Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Keith Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Keith Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Keith Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Keith Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Keith Jones. The network helps show where Keith Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Keith Jones

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Keith Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Keith Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Keith Jones. Keith Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jones, Keith, et al.. (2024). Teaching and Learning of Geometry at Secondary Level. 351–355.
2.
Fujita, Taro, et al.. (2022). Level-spanning proof-production strategies to enhance students’ understanding of the proof structure in school mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 55(7). 1597–1618. 1 indexed citations
3.
Fujita, Taro, et al.. (2020). Spatial reasoning skills about 2D representations of 3D geometrical shapes in grades 4 to 9. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 32(2). 235–255. 27 indexed citations
4.
Jones, Keith, Laura Black, & Alf Coles. (2019). Marking 21 years of Research in Mathematics Education. Research in Mathematics Education. 21(1). 1–5. 2 indexed citations
5.
Jones, Keith, et al.. (2019). Interconnectedness and difference between action research and a lesson design study in Shanghai, China. Educational Action Research. 27(4). 595–612. 3 indexed citations
7.
Clark‐Wilson, Alison, et al.. (2018). Analyzing teachers’ classroom experiences of teaching with dynamic geometry environments: Comparing and Contrasting two approaches. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. Special issue. 93–118. 1 indexed citations
8.
Feng, Huan, Weiguo Zhang, Qian Yu, et al.. (2017). A (Sub)Micro-Scale Investigation of Fe Plaque Distribution in Selected Wetland Plant Root Epidermis. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations
9.
Jones, Keith, et al.. (2014). Working with trainee teachers on their use of digital technologies in the classroom. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).
10.
Bianchi, Diana W., Robert L. Parker, Rajeevi Madankumar, et al.. (2014). DNA Sequencing Versus Standard Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 69(6). 319–321. 6 indexed citations
11.
Fujita, Taro, et al.. (2014). The Influence of 3D Representations on Students' Level of 3D Geometrical Thinking.. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 2 indexed citations
12.
Jones, Keith, et al.. (2014). An Expert Teacher's Local Instruction Theory Underlying a Lesson Design Study through School-Based Professional Development.. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations
13.
Jones, Keith. (2012). Using dynamic geometry software in mathematics teaching: a revised research bibliography. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).
14.
Christou, Constantinos, Marios Pittalis, Nicholas Mousoulides, & Keith Jones. (2006). Developing the 3DMath dynamic geometry software: theoretical perspectives on design. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education. 13(4). 168–174. 22 indexed citations
15.
Brown, Gary, et al.. (2005). ICT and mathematics: a guide to learning and teaching mathematics 11-19. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 254(2). 452–65. 7 indexed citations
16.
Haggarty, Linda, et al.. (2003). Induction for secondary mathematics ITE tutors. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).
17.
Fujita, Taro & Keith Jones. (2002). THE DESIGN OF GEOMETRY TEACHING: LEARNING FROM THE GEOMETRY TEXTBOOKS OF GODFREY AND SIDDONS. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1(2). 1 indexed citations
18.
Mooney, Claire & Keith Jones. (2002). Lost in space: primary trainee teachers’ spatial subject knowledge and their classroom performance. Neuroscience. 431. 128–133. 2 indexed citations
19.
Kushner, Saville, et al.. (2001). TTA school-based research consortium initiative, the evaluation, final report. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 4 indexed citations
20.
Okamoto, Yoshichika, Alysia Chaves, Jingchun Chen, et al.. (2001). Transgenic Mice with Cardiac-Specific Expression of Activating Transcription Factor 3, a Stress-Inducible Gene, Have Conduction Abnormalities and Contractile Dysfunction. American Journal Of Pathology. 159(2). 639–650. 83 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026