Countries citing papers authored by Kathy G. Short
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathy G. Short's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathy G. Short with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathy G. Short more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathy G. Short. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathy G. Short. The network helps show where Kathy G. Short may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathy G. Short
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathy G. Short.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathy G. Short based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kathy G. Short. Kathy G. Short is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Short, Kathy G., et al.. (2000). "I just need to draw": Responding to literature across multiple sign systems. The Reading Teacher. 54(2). 160–171.81 indexed citations
Short, Kathy G.. (1993). Principal Study Groups and Teacher Study Groups: An Interactive and Innovative Approach to Curriculum Change..3 indexed citations
19.
Short, Kathy G., et al.. (1991). How Our Teacher Study Group Sparks Change.. Educational leadership. 49(3). 68.21 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.