This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Shakman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Shakman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Shakman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Shakman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Shakman. The network helps show where Karen Shakman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen Shakman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen Shakman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen Shakman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Karen Shakman. Karen Shakman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lacireno‐Paquet, Natalie, et al.. (2020). Teacher Preparation and Employment Outcomes of Beginning Teachers in Rhode Island. Study Brief. REL 2020-029..
2.
Shakman, Karen, et al.. (2020). Continuous Improvement in Education: A Toolkit for Schools and Districts. REL 2021-014..2 indexed citations
3.
Shakman, Karen, et al.. (2018). "In Theory It's a Good Idea": Understanding Implementation of Proficiency-Based Education in Maine..2 indexed citations
Lacireno‐Paquet, Natalie, et al.. (2016). Redesigning Teacher Evaluation: Lessons Learned from a Pilot Implementation in New Hampshire.. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.
6.
Shakman, Karen, et al.. (2016). Principals' Time, Tasks, and Professional Development: An Analysis of Schools and Staffing Survey Data. REL 2017-201..7 indexed citations
7.
Barnatt, Joan, Dianna Gahlsdorf Terrell, Cindy Jong, et al.. (2016). Interpreting Early Career Trajectories. Educational Policy. 31(7). 992–1032.19 indexed citations
8.
Shakman, Karen, et al.. (2016). Teacher Demographics and Evaluation: A Descriptive Study in a Large Urban District. REL 2017-189..4 indexed citations
9.
Lacireno‐Paquet, Natalie, et al.. (2015). Redesigning Teacher Evaluation: Lessons from a Pilot Implementation. REL 2015-030..5 indexed citations
10.
Lacireno‐Paquet, Natalie, et al.. (2015). Redesigning teacher evaluation: Lessons from a pilot implementation.5 indexed citations
11.
Shakman, Karen, et al.. (2015). Logic Models for Program Design, Implementation, and Evaluation: Workshop Toolkit. REL 2015-057..5 indexed citations
12.
Shakman, Karen, et al.. (2015). Logic models for program design, implementation, and evaluation: Workshop toolkit.10 indexed citations
13.
Shakman, Karen, et al.. (2012). An Examination of Performance-Based Teacher Evaluation Systems in Five States. Summary. Issues & Answers. REL 2012-No. 129..
14.
Shakman, Karen, et al.. (2012). Changing Cultures and Building Capacity: An Exploration of District Strategies for Implementation of Teacher Evaluation Systems..1 indexed citations
Shakman, Karen. (2009). Embracing the Tensions: A Qualitative Case Study of Learning to Teach in a Social Justice Teacher Education Program.3 indexed citations
Shakman, Karen, Marilyn Cochran‐Smith, Cindy Jong, et al.. (2007). Reclaiming Teacher Quality: The Case for Social Justice.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.