Karen Legge

47 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Hit Papers

Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities199520262005201519951995250500750

Peers

Karen Legge
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.6k
  • Strategy and Management 648
  • Sociology and Political Science 577
  • Public Administration 519
  • General Health Professions 467
Replace John Thomas Delaney with:
John Thomas Delaney United States
Klaus Weber United States
Graham Dietz United Kingdom
Stephen Ackroyd United Kingdom
Mark Bevir United States
Michael Useem United States
Robert B. Denhardt United States
Sally Coleman Selden United States
Sonia Ospina United States
Reinhard Bendix United States
Karen Legge relative to John Thomas Delaney United States John Thomas Delaney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
John Thomas Delaney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Karen Legge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen Legge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen Legge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen Legge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen Legge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen Legge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen Legge. The network helps show where Karen Legge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karen Legge

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karen Legge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karen Legge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karen Legge. Karen Legge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 63
3
The Social Fund: Current Role and Future Direction
8
4 42
5
The Experience of managing : a skills guide
0
6 40
7 1
8
Case studies in organizational behaviour and human resource management
11
9 283
10 9
11 43
12 9
13 23
14 3
15
Power, innovation, and problem-solving in personnel management
292
16 4
17 23
18 4
19 5
20 11

About Karen Legge

Karen Legge is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration and Management Information Systems, having authored 49 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (8 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.6k citations), Public Administration (519 citations) and Strategy and Management (648 citations). Karen Legge has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Geoff Lockett, Leah D. Minc, John O’Shea, Willem Jongman, Paul Halstead, Henry T. Wright, Peter Rowley‐Conwy, Hamish Forbes, Peter Garnsey and Lynne Brydon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Management Studies, Journal of the Operational Research Society and Management Decision.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026