Management Decision

4.2k papers and 108.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.2k papers published in Management Decision in the last decades have received a total of 108.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Management Decision usually cover Strategy and Management (1.7k papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.2k papers) and Accounting (601 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (815 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (437 papers) and Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (367 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Management Decision are Nick Bontis, Christian Grönroos, Yu‐Shan Chen, Ching‐Hsun Chang, Francisco J. Lara, C.M. Sashi, Jennifer Rowley, Gwo‐Guang Lee, Satyendra Singh and Steven H. Appelbaum.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Management Decision

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Management Decision. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Management Decision.

Countries where authors publish in Management Decision

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Management Decision. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Management Decision with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Management Decision more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025