Graham Dietz

4.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
30 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Graham Dietz is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science and Public Administration. According to data from OpenAlex, Graham Dietz has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Public Administration. Recurrent topics in Graham Dietz's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (10 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (6 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers). Graham Dietz is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (10 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (6 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers). Graham Dietz collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Australia. Graham Dietz's co-authors include Paul Boselie, Corine Boon, Nicole Gillespie, Deanne N. Den Hartog, Denise Skinner, Antoinette Weibel, Steven Lockey, Mark N. K. Saunders, Adrian Thornhill and Rosalind Searle and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Review, Human Relations and Organization Studies.

In The Last Decade

Graham Dietz

29 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Hit Papers

Commonalities and contrad... 2005 2026 2012 2019 2005 250 500 750 1000

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Graham Dietz United Kingdom 16 1.5k 712 707 320 266 30 2.8k
Emmanuel Ogbonna United Kingdom 31 1.9k 1.3× 895 1.3× 1.1k 1.5× 315 1.0× 249 0.9× 72 3.6k
Chris Rowley United Kingdom 32 1.4k 0.9× 751 1.1× 968 1.4× 289 0.9× 196 0.7× 219 3.2k
Lisa M. Moynihan United States 15 1.9k 1.3× 589 0.8× 618 0.9× 374 1.2× 438 1.6× 20 2.8k
Elizabeth George Hong Kong 22 1.3k 0.9× 933 1.3× 528 0.7× 463 1.4× 568 2.1× 54 3.0k
Veronica Hope Hailey United Kingdom 21 1.5k 1.1× 458 0.6× 539 0.8× 239 0.7× 283 1.1× 38 2.4k
Elaine Farndale United States 35 2.4k 1.6× 529 0.7× 769 1.1× 487 1.5× 260 1.0× 81 3.4k
Lynda Gratton United Kingdom 24 1.1k 0.8× 390 0.5× 581 0.8× 301 0.9× 222 0.8× 60 2.3k
Cherrìe Jiuhua Zhu Australia 31 1.3k 0.9× 541 0.8× 937 1.3× 280 0.9× 372 1.4× 87 2.7k
Frank Mueller United Kingdom 31 1.2k 0.8× 546 0.8× 784 1.1× 151 0.5× 153 0.6× 81 2.5k
Emma Parry United Kingdom 30 1.6k 1.1× 773 1.1× 382 0.5× 302 0.9× 336 1.3× 85 3.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Graham Dietz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Dietz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Dietz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Dietz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Dietz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Dietz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Dietz. The network helps show where Graham Dietz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham Dietz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham Dietz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham Dietz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham Dietz. Graham Dietz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vanhala, Mika & Graham Dietz. (2019). How Trust in One’s Employer Moderates the Relationship Between HRM and Engagement Related Performance. International Studies of Management and Organization. 49(1). 23–42. 15 indexed citations
2.
Möllering, Guido, et al.. (2016). How do we adopt multiple cultural identities? A multidimensional operationalization of the sources of culture. European Management Journal. 34(2). 102–113. 15 indexed citations
3.
Vanhala, Mika & Graham Dietz. (2015). HRM, Trust in Employer and Organizational Performance. Knowledge and Process Management. 22(4). 270–287. 17 indexed citations
4.
Dietz, Graham, et al.. (2014). Establishing HR Professionals’ Influence and Credibility: Lessons from the Capital Markets and Investment Banking Sector. Human Resource Management. 54(1). 105–130. 28 indexed citations
5.
Saunders, Mark N. K., Graham Dietz, & Adrian Thornhill. (2014). Trust and distrust: Polar opposites, or independent but co-existing?. Human Relations. 67(6). 639–665. 93 indexed citations
6.
Hurley, Robert F., Nicole Gillespie, Donald L. Ferrin, & Graham Dietz. (2013). Designing Trustworthy Organizations. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University). 54(4). 74. 23 indexed citations
7.
Skinner, Denise, Graham Dietz, & Antoinette Weibel. (2013). The dark side of trust: When trust becomes a ‘poisoned chalice’. Organization. 21(2). 206–224. 134 indexed citations
8.
Dietz, Graham & Nicole Gillespie. (2012). The recovery of trust: case studies of organisational failures and trust repair. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 5. 17 indexed citations
9.
Dietz, Graham. (2011). Trust in organisational relationships. ˜The œbusiness & management collection.. 2011(7). e1002939–e1002939. 1 indexed citations
10.
Dietz, Graham & Nicole Gillespie. (2011). Repairing internal trust: lessons from Severn Trent. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 1 indexed citations
11.
Dietz, Graham. (2011). Going back to the source: Why do people trust each other?. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 1(2). 215–222. 122 indexed citations
12.
Strätling, Rebecca, et al.. (2011). The impact of contracts on trust in entrepreneur–venture capitalist relationships. International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship. 30(8). 811–831. 30 indexed citations
13.
Dietz, Graham, Denise Skinner, & Antoinette Weibel. (2011). THE TRUE DARK SIDE OF TRUST: WHEN TRUST BECOMES A ‘POISONED CHALICE’. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2011(1). 1–6. 4 indexed citations
14.
Dietz, Graham & Marion Fortin. (2007). Trust and justice in the formation of joint consultative committees. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 18(7). 1159–1181. 23 indexed citations
15.
Dietz, Graham, et al.. (2006). HRM Inside UK E-commerce Firms. International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship. 24(5). 443–470. 13 indexed citations
16.
Dietz, Graham & Deanne N. Den Hartog. (2006). Measuring trust inside organisations. Personnel Review. 35(5). 557–588. 398 indexed citations
17.
Boselie, Paul, Graham Dietz, & Corine Boon. (2005). Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research. Human Resource Management Journal. 15(3). 67–94. 1106 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Dietz, Graham. (2004). Partnership and the development of trust in British workplaces. Human Resource Management Journal. 14(1). 5–24. 72 indexed citations
19.
Dietz, Graham. (2002). The Development Of Mutual Trust In British Workplaces Through 'Partnership': Conceptualisations, Definitions And Experiences.. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
20.
Dietz, Graham. (2002). The Development Of Mutual Trust In British Workplaces Through ?Partnership?. ERIM Report Series Research in Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026