Julie Bowe

494 total citations · 1 hit paper
5 papers, 308 citations indexed

About

Julie Bowe is a scholar working on Education, General Health Professions and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Julie Bowe has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 308 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Education, 1 paper in General Health Professions and 1 paper in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Julie Bowe's work include Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (4 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (3 papers) and Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper). Julie Bowe is often cited by papers focused on Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (4 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (3 papers) and Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper). Julie Bowe collaborates with scholars based in Australia. Julie Bowe's co-authors include Jennifer Gore, Adam Lloyd, David R. Lubans, M. Cecil Smith and Max Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as Teaching and Teacher Education, International Journal of Educational Research and Teachers and Teaching.

In The Last Decade

Julie Bowe

4 papers receiving 292 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Effects of professional development on the quality of teaching: Results from a randomised controlled trial of Quality Teaching Rounds

2017 193 citations Jennifer Gore, Adam Lloyd et al. Teaching and Teacher Education profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Julie Bowe Australia	4	262	47	44	33	24	5	308
Katie Pak United States	6	289 1.1×	53 1.1×	84 1.9×	28 0.8×	23 1.0×	12	355
Quinta Kools Netherlands	9	241 0.9×	17 0.4×	45 1.0×	29 0.9×	27 1.1×	15	282
Cesare Aloisi United Kingdom	6	221 0.8×	15 0.3×	43 1.0×	27 0.8×	24 1.0×	7	289
Kim Frumin United States	7	215 0.8×	41 0.9×	58 1.3×	29 0.9×	25 1.0×	8	287
Siv M. Gamlem Norway	10	383 1.5×	73 1.6×	115 2.6×	14 0.4×	35 1.5×	37	468
Jennifer A. Whitcomb United States	7	300 1.1×	26 0.6×	46 1.0×	70 2.1×	17 0.7×	11	343
Kirk Walters United States	9	306 1.2×	58 1.2×	65 1.5×	22 0.7×	20 0.8×	18	364
Valentina Klenowski Australia	9	331 1.3×	40 0.9×	43 1.0×	26 0.8×	12 0.5×	31	378
Christine Fraser United Kingdom	6	239 0.9×	24 0.5×	58 1.3×	27 0.8×	10 0.4×	9	278
Maaike Koopman Netherlands	10	231 0.9×	14 0.3×	53 1.2×	36 1.1×	22 0.9×	24	285

Countries citing papers authored by Julie Bowe

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Bowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Bowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Bowe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Bowe

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Bowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Bowe. The network helps show where Julie Bowe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julie Bowe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julie Bowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julie Bowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julie Bowe. Julie Bowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Gore, Jennifer, et al.. (2017). Effects of professional development on the quality of teaching: Results from a randomised controlled trial of Quality Teaching Rounds. Teaching and Teacher Education. 68. 99–113. 193 indexed citations breakdown →

2.

Bowe, Julie & Jennifer Gore. (2016). Reassembling teacher professional development: the case for Quality Teaching Rounds. Teachers and Teaching. 1–15. 50 indexed citations

3.

Gore, Jennifer & Julie Bowe. (2015). Interrupting attrition? Re-shaping the transition from preservice to inservice teaching through Quality Teaching Rounds. International Journal of Educational Research. 73. 77–88. 40 indexed citations

4.

Gore, Jennifer, et al.. (2015). Quality Teaching Rounds as a professional development intervention for enhancing the quality of teaching: Rationale and study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Educational Research. 74. 82–95. 24 indexed citations

5.

Bowe, Julie, et al.. (2010). Rounding out professional development: professional learning community, instructional rounds and quality teaching. NOVA (University of Newcastle, Australia). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact