Julie Bowe
Impact in
- Education top 5%
- Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
- Online and Blended Learning
- Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods
- Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
-
- Educational Assessment and Improvement
Papers in
-
- Teacher Education and Leadership Studies 4
- Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion 3
- Education and Technology Integration 1
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices 1
-
- Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues 1
- Co-authors
- Jennifer Gore (5 shared papers)Adam Lloyd (2 shared papers)David R. Lubans (2 shared papers)M. Cecil Smith (1 shared paper)Max Smith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- International Journal of Educational Research (2 papers)Teaching and Teacher Education (1 paper)Teachers and Teaching (1 paper)NOVA (University of Newcastle, Australia) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
Julie Bowe
4 papers receiving 298 citations
Julie Bowe's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Education 263
- Information Systems and Management 47
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 9
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 43
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 13
Countries citing papers authored by Julie Bowe
This map shows the geographic impact of Julie Bowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julie Bowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julie Bowe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julie Bowe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julie Bowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julie Bowe. The network helps show where Julie Bowe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Julie Bowe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Effects of professional development on the quality of teaching: Results from a randomised controlled trial of Quality Teaching Rounds Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 201 |
| 2 | 2016 | 50 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 5 | Rounding out professional development: professional learning community, instructional rounds and quality teaching | 2010 | 1 |
About Julie Bowe
Julie Bowe is a scholar working on Education, General Health Professions, Information Systems and Management, Philosophy and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (4 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (3 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (1 paper), Education and Technology Integration (1 paper), Educational Assessment and Improvement (1 paper) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Education (263 citations), Information Systems and Management (47 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (9 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (43 citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (13 citations). Julie Bowe has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Gore, Adam Lloyd, David R. Lubans, M. Cecil Smith and Max Smith. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Educational Research, Teaching and Teacher Education, Teachers and Teaching and NOVA (University of Newcastle, Australia).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.