John Kim

2.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
15 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

John Kim is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Marketing and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, John Kim has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Marketing and 2 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in John Kim's work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (8 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (7 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (4 papers). John Kim is often cited by papers focused on Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (8 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (7 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (4 papers). John Kim collaborates with scholars based in United States and Latvia. John Kim's co-authors include Frank R. Kardes, Paul M. Herr, Jeen‐Su Lim, Gillian Naylor, Eugene Sivadas, Vijayan Sugumaran, Srinarayan Sharma, Kenneth M. York, Richard E. Plank and Robert Dahlstrøm and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Business Research and The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

In The Last Decade

John Kim

14 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective

1991 1.6k citations Paul M. Herr, Frank R. Kardes et al. Journal of Consumer Research profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John Kim United States	10	1.4k	1.1k	586	408	179	15	1.8k
Dawn Lerman United States	14	1.0k 0.8×	860 0.8×	346 0.6×	330 0.8×	144 0.8×	32	1.5k
Fred Bronner Netherlands	19	1.8k 1.3×	978 0.9×	341 0.6×	479 1.2×	237 1.3×	29	2.1k
Laurence Dessart Belgium	13	1.8k 1.3×	1.3k 1.2×	533 0.9×	564 1.4×	197 1.1×	23	2.1k
María Sicilia Piñero Spain	21	1.2k 0.8×	893 0.8×	305 0.5×	454 1.1×	188 1.1×	54	1.6k
Christy Ashley United States	12	1.1k 0.8×	778 0.7×	287 0.5×	353 0.9×	153 0.9×	22	1.5k
Dong‐Mo Koo South Korea	19	1.1k 0.8×	963 0.9×	417 0.7×	560 1.4×	168 0.9×	39	1.8k
Kristine De Valck France	12	1.8k 1.3×	1.0k 1.0×	419 0.7×	712 1.7×	297 1.7×	19	2.1k
Elaine Wallace Ireland	21	1.1k 0.8×	1.0k 1.0×	538 0.9×	288 0.7×	104 0.6×	36	1.7k
Barbara Bickart United States	17	1.9k 1.4×	1.4k 1.3×	586 1.0×	685 1.7×	265 1.5×	35	2.6k
Juha Munnukka Finland	18	1.2k 0.9×	886 0.8×	318 0.5×	360 0.9×	137 0.8×	36	1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by John Kim

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Kim

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Kim. The network helps show where John Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Kim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Kim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Kim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Kim. John Kim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

Kim, John, Sanya Carley, David M. Konisky, et al.. (2025). Beyond the cost: Electric vehicle ownership and adoption intent in U.S. households. Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment. 147. 104973–104973.

Zheng, Xin, et al.. (2019). 486 Social Media Use in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patient Education: A Content Analysis of YouTube Videos. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 114(1). S281–S282. 1 indexed citations

Stanton, Steven J., et al.. (2018). Incentivized methods to generate electronic word-of-mouth: Implications for the resort industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 78. 142–149. 18 indexed citations

Dwyer, Patrick C., Paul T. Fuglestad, John Kim, et al.. (2017). Encouraging online engagement: The role of interdependent self-construal and social motives in fostering online participation. Personality and Individual Differences. 133. 47–55. 9 indexed citations

Kim, John, Gillian Naylor, Eugene Sivadas, & Vijayan Sugumaran. (2015). The unrealized value of incentivized eWOM recommendations. Marketing Letters. 27(3). 411–421. 38 indexed citations

Townsend, David M., Mark Simon, John Kim, & Susan M. Houghton. (2013). OVERCONFIDENCE AND COGNITIVE ENTRENCHMENT IN ENTREPRENEUR DECISION-MAKING (SUMMARY). Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. 32(6). 18. 1 indexed citations

Kim, John. (2013). Trophies, Plaques, and Rewards: An Application of Cognitive Evaluation Theory to Volunteer Motivation.. VCU Scholars Compass (Virginia Commonwealth University). 1 indexed citations

Dwyer, Patrick C., et al.. (2012). What makes users rate (share, tag, edit...)?. PubMed. 2012. 969–978. 28 indexed citations

Simon, Mark, John Kim, Susan M. Houghton, & Xiaodong Deng. (2011). When It's Right to Be "Wrong": The Effects of Overconfidence and Planning on Product Performance in a Dynamic Environment. Journal of Small Business Strategy. 22(1). 21–46. 5 indexed citations

10.

Kim, John, Kenneth M. York, & Jeen‐Su Lim. (2010). The role of brands in recruitment: A mixed-brand strategy approach. Marketing Letters. 22(2). 165–179. 24 indexed citations

11.

Kim, John, et al.. (2002). A framework for building brand equity online for pure‐play B2C retailers and services. The International Journal on Media Management. 4(2). 123–133. 25 indexed citations

12.

Kim, John, David A. Reid, Richard E. Plank, & Robert Dahlstrøm. (1999). Examining the Role of Brand Equity in Business Markets: A Model, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing. 5(3). 65–89. 33 indexed citations

13.

Kardes, Frank R., John Kim, & Jeen‐Su Lim. (1994). Moderating effects of prior knowledge on the perceived diagnosticity of beliefs derived from implicit versus explicit product claims. Journal of Business Research. 29(3). 219–224. 41 indexed citations

14.

Lim, Jeen‐Su & John Kim. (1992). Impact of consumers' confidence in judgements about missing information on product evaluations. Journal of Business Research. 25(3). 215–229. 20 indexed citations

15.

Herr, Paul M., Frank R. Kardes, & John Kim. (1991). Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research. 17(4). 454–454. 1597 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact