Countries citing papers authored by Joëlle Vanhamme
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Joëlle Vanhamme's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joëlle Vanhamme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joëlle Vanhamme more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joëlle Vanhamme. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joëlle Vanhamme. The network helps show where Joëlle Vanhamme may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joëlle Vanhamme
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joëlle Vanhamme.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joëlle Vanhamme based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joëlle Vanhamme. Joëlle Vanhamme is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Vanhamme, Joëlle, Adam Lindgreen, & Gülen Sarial‐Abi. (2021). Luxury Ethical Consumers: Who Are They?. Journal of Business Ethics. 183(3). 805–838.17 indexed citations
Janssen, Catherine, et al.. (2015). Should Luxury Brands Shout Or Whisper? the Effects of Brand Prominence on Consumer Perceptions of Responsible Luxury. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles).2 indexed citations
Vanhamme, Joëlle, et al.. (2008). Nuki Emotion Measurement Instrument: Development of a Non-Verbal Self-Report Emotions Measurement Instrument For Children. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
Vanhamme, Joëlle & Cees de Bont. (2005). "Surprise Gift" Purchases of Small Electric Appliances: A Pilot Study. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).
Vanhamme, Joëlle. (2004). La surprise et son influence sur la satisfaction des consommateurs: synthese des recherches et implications manageriales. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 41.2 indexed citations
14.
Swaen, Valérie & Joëlle Vanhamme. (2004). The use of corporate social responsibility arguments in communication campaigns: Does source credibility matter?. Advances in consumer research.33 indexed citations
15.
Vanhamme, Joëlle, et al.. (2003). What if you surprise your customers... will they be more satisfied/? findings from a pilot experiment. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 48–53.24 indexed citations
16.
Swaen, Valérie & Joëlle Vanhamme. (2003). See How 'Good' We Are: The Dangers of Using Corporate Social Activities in Communication Campaigns. Advances in consumer research.30 indexed citations
17.
Vanhamme, Joëlle. (2002). La satisfaction des consommateurs spécifique à une transaction.8 indexed citations
18.
Vanhamme, Joëlle, et al.. (2001). The role of surprise in satisfaction judgements. TU/e Research Portal (Eindhoven University of Technology). 14. 27–45.39 indexed citations
19.
Vanhamme, Joëlle & Adam Lindgreen. (2001). Surprise as a marketing tool. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).4 indexed citations
20.
Vanhamme, Joëlle. (1998). Une analyse qualitative des seniors face à la grande distribution: application de la grille de Gritti. Revue française du marketing. 41–56.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.