Cees de Bont

685 citations
37 papers · 443 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Cees de Bont

30 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers

Cees de Bont
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Marketing 135
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 83
  • Human-Computer Interaction 37
  • Media Technology 57
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 59
Replace Roberto Micera with:
Roberto Micera Italy
Suvi Nenonen Finland
Luca Simeone Denmark
Pham Thi Minh Ly Vietnam
Ignasi Capdevila France
Yen Hsu Taiwan
Tainyi Luor Taiwan
Gavin Melles Australia
Stephen Potter United Kingdom
Nila Armelia Windasari Indonesia
Cees de Bont relative to Roberto Micera Italy Roberto Micera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Roberto Micera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cees de Bont

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cees de Bont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cees de Bont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cees de Bont more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cees de Bont

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cees de Bont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cees de Bont. The network helps show where Cees de Bont may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Cees de Bont, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cees de Bont Line = papers co-authored together Cees de Bont links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201569
2 201152
3
Do We Need Involvement to Understand Consumer Behavior
199548
4 199539
5 201238
6 200832
7 199522
8
Consumer evaluations of early product-concepts
199218
9 200918
10
Market research handbook
200715
11 201613
12 201810
13 20209
14 19929
15 20227
16 20177
17 20236
18
PARTICIPATORY PROTOTYPING FOR FUTURE CITIES
20155
19
EXPLORING COLLABORATION IN A NETWORKED INNOVATION PROJECT IN INDUSTRY
20114
20 20174

About Cees de Bont

Cees de Bont is a scholar working on Marketing, Mechanical Engineering, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 37 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Design Education and Practice (11 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (6 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (6 papers), Color perception and design (4 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (4 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (4 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers) and Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (135 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (83 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (37 citations), Media Technology (57 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (59 citations). Cees de Bont has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Jan Schoormans, Ingrid Mulder, Theo B.C. Poiesz, Gerda Gemser, Joëlle Vanhamme, Roland Ortt, Kees Maat, Ken Friedman, Paul Hekkert and Bert van Wee. Their work appears in journals such as She ji, Design Studies, Journal of Engineering Design, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management and Information Technology & Tourism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact