California Management Review

2.1k papers and 143.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in California Management Review in the last decades have received a total of 143.2k indexed citations. Papers published in California Management Review usually cover Strategy and Management (530 papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (197 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (193 papers) specifically the topics of Innovation and Knowledge Management (236 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (111 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in California Management Review are Robert M. Grant, David A. Aaker, David J. Teece, Jeffrey Pfeffer, Michael L. Tushman, Charles A. O’Reilly, John Elkington, Henry Mintzberg, Henry Chesbrough and Ikujiro Nonaka.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in California Management Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in California Management Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in California Management Review.

Countries where authors publish in California Management Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in California Management Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in California Management Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites California Management Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025