Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Jiangang Hao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jiangang Hao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jiangang Hao more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jiangang Hao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jiangang Hao. The network helps show where Jiangang Hao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jiangang Hao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jiangang Hao.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jiangang Hao based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jiangang Hao. Jiangang Hao is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hao, Jiangang, Lei Chen, Michael Flor, Lei Liu, & Alina A. von Davier. (2017). CPS-Rater: Automated Sequential Annotation for Conversations in Collaborative Problem-Solving Activities. Research Report. ETS RR-17-58.. ETS Research Report Series.2 indexed citations
11.
Hao, Jiangang, Lawrence L. Smith, Robert J. Mislevy, Alina von Davier, & Malcolm Bauer. (2016). Taming Log Files from Game/Simulation-Based Assessments: Data Models and Data Analysis Tools. Research Report. ETS RR-16-10.. ETS Research Report Series.5 indexed citations
12.
Hao, Jiangang, Lei Liu, Alina von Davier, Patrick C. Kyllonen, & Christopher Kitchen. (2016). Collaborative Problem Solving Skills versus Collaboration Outcomes: Findings from Statistical Analysis and Data Mining.. Educational Data Mining. 382–387.13 indexed citations
13.
Khan, Saad, et al.. (2015). On Convergence of Cognitive and Non-cognitive Behavior in Collaborative Activity.. Educational Data Mining. 496–499.7 indexed citations
14.
Hao, Jiangang. (2009). Chemical looping combustion of sawdust in a 10 kW_(th) interconnected fluidized bed. Journal of the Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China.9 indexed citations
15.
Hao, Jiangang. (2009). Experimental Study on Syngas Production From Biomass Gasification in Interconnected Fluidized Beds. Proceedings of the CSEE.6 indexed citations
16.
Hao, Jiangang & Ratindranath Akhoury. (2005). Can Relativistic MOND Theory Resolve Both the Dark Matter and Dark Energy Paradigms. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
17.
Hao, Jiangang & Xin-Zhou Li. (2004). Generalized quartessence cosmic dynamics: phantom or quintessence with de Sitter attractor. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
18.
Hao, Jiangang & Xin-Zhou Li. (2003). Phantom cosmic doomsday: a tale of two attractors. arXiv (Cornell University).4 indexed citations
19.
Li, Xin-Zhou & Jiangang Hao. (2003). O(N) Phantom, A Way to Implement w<-1. arXiv (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.