Jane Salisbury

927 total citations
24 papers, 618 citations indexed

About

Jane Salisbury is a scholar working on Education, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Salisbury has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 618 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Education, 11 papers in Human Factors and Ergonomics and 4 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Jane Salisbury's work include Education Systems and Policy (12 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (11 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (5 papers). Jane Salisbury is often cited by papers focused on Education Systems and Policy (12 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (11 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (5 papers). Jane Salisbury collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Singapore. Jane Salisbury's co-authors include Gareth Rees, Sara Delamont, Stephen Gorard, Martin Jephcote, John Furlong, Anne Murcott, Gordon R. Mitchell, John L. Fletcher, Ian Graham and Sue Davies and has published in prestigious journals such as Teaching and Teacher Education, The Sociological Review and British Educational Research Journal.

In The Last Decade

Jane Salisbury

24 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Salisbury United Kingdom 10 428 157 81 80 80 24 618
Jo Frankham United Kingdom 13 367 0.9× 257 1.6× 75 0.9× 95 1.2× 36 0.5× 30 718
Agnes Bosanquet Australia 10 385 0.9× 71 0.5× 44 0.5× 76 0.9× 36 0.5× 31 599
Jacqueline Stevenson United Kingdom 16 520 1.2× 259 1.6× 44 0.5× 148 1.9× 35 0.4× 43 754
Inge Bates United Kingdom 12 343 0.8× 298 1.9× 50 0.6× 135 1.7× 123 1.5× 19 601
Veronica McGivney United Kingdom 10 339 0.8× 124 0.8× 25 0.3× 54 0.7× 47 0.6× 34 510
Matthew Clarke United Kingdom 18 719 1.7× 350 2.2× 46 0.6× 269 3.4× 75 0.9× 60 1.2k
Ann Briggs United Kingdom 11 457 1.1× 83 0.5× 17 0.2× 67 0.8× 60 0.8× 29 663
Eva Bendix Petersen Australia 14 370 0.9× 268 1.7× 100 1.2× 198 2.5× 32 0.4× 37 746
Peter Ribbins United Kingdom 18 788 1.8× 199 1.3× 36 0.4× 154 1.9× 88 1.1× 61 1.0k
John Coldron United Kingdom 11 776 1.8× 199 1.3× 25 0.3× 95 1.2× 49 0.6× 29 910

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Salisbury

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Salisbury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Salisbury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Salisbury more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Salisbury

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Salisbury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Salisbury. The network helps show where Jane Salisbury may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Salisbury

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Salisbury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Salisbury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Salisbury. Jane Salisbury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Salisbury, Jane, et al.. (2012). Compulsive Working, ‘Hyperprofessionality’ and the Unseen Pleasures of Academic Work. Higher Education Quarterly. 66(2). 135–154. 65 indexed citations
2.
Salisbury, Jane, et al.. (2011). What's occurring? The what, why, when and how of research capacity building in a modest pilot project with EAL learners and science. Cardiff Metropolitan Research Repository (Cardiff Metropolitan University). 15(1). 1 indexed citations
3.
Salisbury, Jane & Martin Jephcote. (2009). Mucking in and mucking out: Vocational learning in Animal Care. Teaching and Teacher Education. 26(1). 71–81. 2 indexed citations
4.
Jephcote, Martin & Jane Salisbury. (2009). Further education teachers' accounts of their professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education. 25(7). 966–972. 40 indexed citations
5.
Jephcote, Martin, Jane Salisbury, & Gareth Rees. (2009). The learning journey: Students' experiences of further education in Wales. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff. 5 indexed citations
6.
Fowler, Zoë, et al.. (2009). Building research capacity in Education: evidence from recent initiatives in England, Scotland and Wales. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff. 1(2). 173–189. 6 indexed citations
7.
Salisbury, Jane, et al.. (2009). Building educational research capacity through inter-institutional collaboration: an evaluation of the first year of the Welsh Education Research Network (WERN). ORCA Online Research @Cardiff. 14(2). 10 indexed citations
8.
Davies, Sue & Jane Salisbury. (2009). Researching and learning together: inter-institutional collaboration as strategy for capacity building. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff. 3 indexed citations
9.
Salisbury, Jane, et al.. (2009). Time spent among other people is where meaning is found.' The 'working lives' research report on narratives of occupational change in further and higher education in post-devolution Wales. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire). 14(2). 1 indexed citations
10.
Jephcote, Martin, Jane Salisbury, & Gareth Rees. (2008). Being a teacher in further education in changing times. Research in Post-Compulsory Education. 13(2). 163–172. 33 indexed citations
11.
Jephcote, Martin & Jane Salisbury. (2008). The wider social context of learning: beyond the classroom door. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff. 1 indexed citations
12.
Salisbury, Jane & Martin Jephcote. (2008). Initial encounters of an FE kind. Research in Post-Compulsory Education. 13(2). 149–162. 4 indexed citations
13.
Jephcote, Martin & Jane Salisbury. (2007). The Long Shadow of Incorporation: the Further Education Sector in Devolved Wales. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff. 14(1). 4 indexed citations
14.
Furlong, John & Jane Salisbury. (2005). Best practice research scholarships: An evaluation. Research Papers in Education. 20(1). 45–83. 60 indexed citations
15.
Salisbury, Jane. (2004). Clients, claimants or learners? Exploring the joined‐up working of New Deal for 18–24 year olds. Journal of Education Policy. 19(1). 81–104. 5 indexed citations
16.
Gorard, Stephen, Gareth Rees, & Jane Salisbury. (1999). Reappraising the Apparent Underachievement of Boys at School. Gender and Education. 11(4). 441–454. 70 indexed citations
17.
Graham, Ian, John L. Fletcher, Martin Jephcote, Gordon R. Mitchell, & Jane Salisbury. (1997). Principals' responses to incorporation and the new funding regime. Journal of Vocational Education and Training. 49(4). 545–562. 2 indexed citations
18.
Jephcote, Martin, Jane Salisbury, John L. Fletcher, Ian Graham, & Gordon R. Mitchell. (1996). Principals’ Responses to Incorporation: A Window on their Culture. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 20(2). 33–48. 12 indexed citations
19.
Salisbury, Jane & Sara Delamont. (1995). Qualitative studies in education. Avebury eBooks. 147 indexed citations
20.
Salisbury, Jane & Anne Murcott. (1992). Pleasing the Students: Teachers' Orientaton to Classroom Life in Adult Education. The Sociological Review. 40(3). 561–575. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026