Ingo Winkler
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Topics
- Management and Organizational Studies (9 papers)Ethics in Business and Education (5 papers)Emotional Labor in Professions (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Ingo Winkler
29 papers receiving 403 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 141
- Sociology and Political Science 138
- Education 100
- Strategy and Management 59
- General Health Professions 55
Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Winkler
This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Winkler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Winkler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Winkler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Winkler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Winkler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Winkler. The network helps show where Ingo Winkler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ingo Winkler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ingo Winkler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ingo Winkler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ingo Winkler. Ingo Winkler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 60 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | Stakeholder Salience in Corporate Codes of Ethics - Using Legitimacy, Power, and Urgency to Explain Stakeholder Relevance in Ethical Codes of German Blue Chip Companies | 3 |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | Komparácia firemných etických kódexov v slovenských a západonemeckých firmách | 0 |
| 19 | COMPARISON OF CORPORATE CODES ON ETHICS IN SLOVAK AND WESTERN GERMAN FIRMS | 0 |
| 20 | 33 |
About Ingo Winkler
Ingo Winkler is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 441 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (9 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (5 papers) and Emotional Labor in Professions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (141 citations), Public Administration (25 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (15 citations). Ingo Winkler has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Anna Remišová, Elke Weik, Rosalía Cascón‐Pereira and Stefanie Reissner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, International Journal of Management Reviews and Qualitative Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.