Inge Neyens

670 total citations
23 papers, 446 citations indexed

About

Inge Neyens is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Inge Neyens has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 446 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in General Health Professions and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Inge Neyens's work include Workplace Violence and Bullying (5 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers). Inge Neyens is often cited by papers focused on Workplace Violence and Bullying (5 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers). Inge Neyens collaborates with scholars based in Belgium and Netherlands. Inge Neyens's co-authors include Elfi Baillien, Hans De Witte, Nele De Cuyper, Dries Faems, Luc Sels, Maddy Janssens, Chantal Van Audenhove, Jaap van Weeghel, Eva Oldenburger and Sofie Isebaert and has published in prestigious journals such as Radiotherapy and Oncology, Patient Education and Counseling and International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship.

In The Last Decade

Inge Neyens

19 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Inge Neyens Belgium 7 264 142 128 107 51 23 446
Ana M. Sariol United States 5 105 0.4× 58 0.4× 134 1.0× 85 0.8× 37 0.7× 8 335
Julie Cloutier Canada 8 89 0.3× 55 0.4× 248 1.9× 80 0.7× 89 1.7× 24 459
Trisha Michelle Pettit Australia 4 173 0.7× 96 0.7× 201 1.6× 92 0.9× 118 2.3× 5 430
Alev Katrinli Türkiye 10 102 0.4× 70 0.5× 168 1.3× 43 0.4× 50 1.0× 20 320
François Grima France 11 122 0.5× 73 0.5× 160 1.3× 50 0.5× 101 2.0× 55 404
Gonca Günay Türkiye 8 129 0.5× 53 0.4× 228 1.8× 50 0.5× 47 0.9× 14 444
Beni Halvorsen Australia 12 94 0.4× 45 0.3× 178 1.4× 62 0.6× 42 0.8× 23 336
Ngan Collins Australia 11 93 0.4× 64 0.5× 164 1.3× 50 0.5× 60 1.2× 23 346
Silvia A Nelson Australia 10 67 0.3× 45 0.3× 139 1.1× 48 0.4× 85 1.7× 20 320
Danat Valizade United Kingdom 10 134 0.5× 39 0.3× 150 1.2× 49 0.5× 145 2.8× 23 413

Countries citing papers authored by Inge Neyens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Neyens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Neyens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Neyens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inge Neyens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Neyens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Neyens. The network helps show where Inge Neyens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inge Neyens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inge Neyens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inge Neyens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inge Neyens. Inge Neyens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Oldenburger, Eva, Inge Neyens, Annemarie Coolbrandt, et al.. (2021). Using ePROMs for follow-up after palliative radiotherapy: An exploratory study with patients and health care providers. Patient Education and Counseling. 105(7). 2355–2361. 6 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Pierre, et al.. (2021). Stakeholder Coalitions and Priorities Around the Policy Goals of a Nation-Wide Mental Health Care Reform. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 48(4). 639–653. 1 indexed citations
3.
Oldenburger, Eva, Foppe Oldenburger, Annemarie Coolbrandt, et al.. (2020). The use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in palliative radiotherapy: A topical review. Radiotherapy and Oncology. 149. 94–103. 14 indexed citations
4.
Neyens, Inge, et al.. (2016). Slimme technologie als alternatief voor fysieke fixatie: eindrapport. Lirias (KU Leuven).
5.
Neyens, Inge, et al.. (2015). Perspectives of hospitalized patients with mental disorders and their clinicians on vocational goals, barriers, and steps to overcome barriers. Journal of Mental Health. 24(4). 196–201. 11 indexed citations
6.
Neyens, Inge, Joke Vanderhaegen, & Chantal Van Audenhove. (2015). Problematisch alcoholgebruik in de praktijk. 44(2). 54–57.
7.
Neyens, Inge, et al.. (2014). Beliefs of Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors About Competitive Employment for People With Severe Mental Illness in Belgium. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 58(3). 176–188. 6 indexed citations
8.
Coppens, Evelien, et al.. (2014). Stigmatisering t.a.v. psychologische problemen: ervaringen en attitudes in Vlaanderen. Lirias (KU Leuven). 1 indexed citations
9.
Neyens, Inge & Dries Faems. (2013). Exploring the Impact of Alliance Portfolio Management Design on Alliance Portfolio Performance. Managerial and Decision Economics. 34(3-5). 347–361. 5 indexed citations
10.
Faems, Dries, Maddy Janssens, & Inge Neyens. (2012). Alliance Portfolios and Innovation Performance. Group & Organization Management. 37(2). 241–268. 39 indexed citations
11.
Baillien, Elfi, Inge Neyens, & Hans De Witte. (2011). Organizational correlates of workplace bullying in small- and medium-sized enterprises. International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship. 29(6). 610–625. 24 indexed citations
12.
Baillien, Elfi, Hans De Witte, Guy Notelaers, & Inge Neyens. (2008). De ontwikkeling van de RATOG: een screeningsinstrument voor de preventie van pesterijen op het werk. Gedrag & Organisatie. 21(3). 4 indexed citations
13.
Baillien, Elfi, Inge Neyens, Hans De Witte, & Nele De Cuyper. (2008). A qualitative study on the development of workplace bullying: Towards a three way model. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 19(1). 1–16. 216 indexed citations
14.
Baillien, Elfi, Inge Neyens, Hans De Witte, & Guy Notelaers. (2008). Van conflictescalatie tot pesterijen op het werk: een analyse met de conflicthanteringstijlen uit de Dual Concern Theorie. Gedrag & Organisatie. 21(2). 2 indexed citations
15.
Notelaers, Guy, et al.. (2007). Risk groups and risk sectors for workplace bullying among Flemish employees. 1 indexed citations
16.
Baillien, Elfi, Inge Neyens, & Hans De Witte. (2007). Naar een procesmodel voor pesterijen op het werk: een kwalitatieve studie. Gedrag & Organisatie. 20(1). 1 indexed citations
17.
Neyens, Inge, Elfi Baillien, Hans De Witte, & Guy Notelaers. (2007). Pesten op het werk: risicofactoren in werk en organisatie. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken. 23(4). 1 indexed citations
18.
Neyens, Inge, et al.. (2005). Risicofactoren voor het slachtofferschap van geweld, pesterijen en ongewenst seksueel gedrag in kleine en middelgrote organisaties: een kwantitatieve studie. 1 indexed citations
19.
Baillien, Elfi, et al.. (2005). Ongewenst grensoverschrijdend gedrag op het werk: op welke manier speelt de organisatie een rol? Een kwantitatieve studie van risciofactoren op niveau van job, team en organisatie. Lirias (KU Leuven). 3 indexed citations
20.
Baillien, Elfi, Inge Neyens, & Hans De Witte. (2005). Task-, team- and organizational risk factors for mobbing at work: a qualitative study.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026