Helen Forbes

67 total papers · 995 total citations
33 papers, 721 citations indexed

About

Helen Forbes is a scholar working on Physiology, General Health Professions and Research and Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Helen Forbes has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 721 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Physiology, 7 papers in General Health Professions and 7 papers in Research and Theory. Recurrent topics in Helen Forbes's work include Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (9 papers), Nursing education and management (7 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers). Helen Forbes is often cited by papers focused on Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (9 papers), Nursing education and management (7 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers). Helen Forbes collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Helen Forbes's co-authors include Maxine Duke, Simon Cooper, Fiona Bogossian, Tracey Bucknall, Nicole M. Phillips, Michael Prosser, Diane M. Loach, Gerald W. Tannock, Howard F. Jenkinson and Pauline S. Handley and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, British journal of surgery and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Helen Forbes

31 papers receiving 684 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Helen Forbes 207 187 179 114 73 33 721
Margaret Landers 147 0.7× 161 0.9× 98 0.5× 301 2.6× 101 1.4× 42 875
Linda Ferguson 163 0.8× 49 0.3× 87 0.5× 243 2.1× 109 1.5× 42 877
Patricia Ravert 283 1.4× 559 3.0× 157 0.9× 172 1.5× 139 1.9× 31 804
Joanne Itano 130 0.6× 50 0.3× 132 0.7× 247 2.2× 90 1.2× 23 683
Catherine Fetherston 103 0.5× 44 0.2× 69 0.4× 116 1.0× 24 0.3× 41 712
Janet Green 187 0.9× 32 0.2× 105 0.6× 129 1.1× 40 0.5× 54 781
Petra M. Casey 486 2.3× 78 0.4× 43 0.2× 178 1.6× 10 0.1× 50 910
Nadine T. Katz 507 2.4× 160 0.9× 85 0.5× 168 1.5× 15 0.2× 40 867
Marilyn Baird 206 1.0× 68 0.4× 151 0.8× 173 1.5× 35 0.5× 54 876
Maggie Allen 476 2.3× 109 0.6× 73 0.4× 209 1.8× 6 0.1× 26 770

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Forbes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Forbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Forbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Forbes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Forbes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Forbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Forbes. The network helps show where Helen Forbes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Forbes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Forbes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Forbes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Forbes. Helen Forbes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026