Helen Forbes
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Physiology
- Education top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Research and Theory top 2%
- Co-authors
- Maxine DukeSimon CooperFiona BogossianTracey BucknallNicole M. PhillipsMichael ProsserRoderick McNabGerald W. Tannock
- Topics
- Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (9 papers)Nursing education and management (7 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Helen Forbes
31 papers receiving 688 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 205
- Physiology 186
- Education 179
- General Health Professions 115
- Research and Theory 74
Countries citing papers authored by Helen Forbes
This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Forbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Forbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Forbes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Forbes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Forbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Forbes. The network helps show where Helen Forbes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Forbes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Forbes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Forbes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Forbes. Helen Forbes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | Preliminary Findings from an Instrument Development Study to Measure Perceived Competence and Confidence of Clinical Nurse Educators | 0 |
| 7 | 137 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 49 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | Jarvis's physical examination and health assessment | 9 |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 95 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About Helen Forbes
Helen Forbes is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Leadership and Management and Family Practice, having authored 33 papers that have together received 725 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (9 papers), Nursing education and management (7 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (74 citations), Leadership and Management (27 citations) and Family Practice (37 citations). Helen Forbes has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Maxine Duke, Simon Cooper, Fiona Bogossian, Tracey Bucknall, Nicole M. Phillips, Michael Prosser, Roderick McNab, Gerald W. Tannock, Pauline S. Handley and Howard F. Jenkinson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, British journal of surgery and Journal of Advanced Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.