Diane Phillips

22 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers

Diane Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Research and Theory 11
  • Language and Linguistics 50
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 8
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 26
  • Literature and Literary Theory 34
Replace Mary Chabeli with:
Mary Chabeli South Africa
Mary Motz Canada
Margaret Moorman United States
Beverly Baker Canada
Eva Liang United States
Steven Lyttle United Kingdom
Julia Terry United Kingdom
Leen Aper Belgium
Hannah Ainsworth United Kingdom
Andrew Freeman Canada
Diane Phillips relative to Mary Chabeli South Africa Mary Chabeli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Mary Chabeli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diane Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Phillips. The network helps show where Diane Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diane Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diane Phillips Line = papers co-authored together Diane Phillips links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201915
2 20187
3 20175
4
Investigating the feasibility and reliability of a task trainer incorporating haptics and virtual reality (VR) to enhance midwifery student learning.
20161
5 201510
6 201448
7 20135
8 201217
9 201214
10 20086
11 20084
12 200710
13 200734
14 20074
15 20068
16 200226
17 19955
18
Australian women at the Olympics: achievement and alienation.
19901
19
Nurse education. Issues: Competency scoring.
19901
20
Teaching practice handbook
198377

About Diane Phillips

Diane Phillips is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Conservation, Transplantation and Museology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reflective Practices in Education (4 papers), Adult and Continuing Education Topics (4 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (3 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (3 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (2 papers) and Art Therapy and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (11 citations), Language and Linguistics (50 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (8 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (26 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (34 citations). Diane Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Steve Walters, Barbara Hayes, Maxine Duke, Kara M. Bensley, Karissa D. Horton, Alison M. Hutchinson, Robert J. Bensley, Helen Forbes, Kristina Thomas and Helen Cox. Their work appears in journals such as Women and Birth, Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia, Journal of Drug Issues, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Nurse Education Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026