Maxine Duke
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 2%
- Nursing education and management
Papers in
-
- Nursing education and management 9
- Co-authors
- Mari BottiNicole M. PhillipsAnnette StreetLauren McTierHelen ForbesS. J. KingSonja ClearyTrisha Dunning
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Nursing (6 papers)Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia (4 papers)Journal of Advanced Nursing (3 papers)International Journal of Nursing Studies (2 papers)Nurse Education Today (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Maxine Duke
44 papers receiving 629 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Research and Theory 97
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 20
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 73
- Family Practice 25
- Emergency Medical Services 81
Countries citing papers authored by Maxine Duke
This map shows the geographic impact of Maxine Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maxine Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maxine Duke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maxine Duke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maxine Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maxine Duke. The network helps show where Maxine Duke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Maxine Duke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 6 | Preliminary Findings from an Instrument Development Study to Measure Perceived Competence and Confidence of Clinical Nurse Educators | 2016 | 0 |
| 7 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 37 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 60 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 23 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 39 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 64 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 52 |
About Maxine Duke
Maxine Duke is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Leadership and Management, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 45 papers that have together received 679 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (9 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (6 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (6 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (6 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (5 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (5 papers) and Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (97 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (20 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (73 citations), Family Practice (25 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (81 citations). Maxine Duke has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Mari Botti, Nicole M. Phillips, Annette Street, Lauren McTier, Helen Forbes, S. J. King, Sonja Cleary, Trisha Dunning, Megan‐Jane Johnstone and Angela Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Nursing, Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia, Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Nurse Education Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.