Elizabeth Watt
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Research and Theory top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Radiation top 10%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- David EdvardssonTyler MeyerMichael RoumeliotisSiraj HusainSarah QuirkAndrew ScanlonLeigh ConroyKaren Long
- Topics
- Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (15 papers)Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (10 papers)Breast Implant and Reconstruction (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth Watt
39 papers receiving 540 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- General Health Professions 267
- Research and Theory 120
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 94
- Radiation 85
- Surgery 73
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Watt
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Watt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Watt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Watt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Watt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Watt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Watt. The network helps show where Elizabeth Watt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Watt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Watt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Watt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Watt. Elizabeth Watt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 37 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Consultation, Consensus and Commitment to Guidelines for Inclusion of Continence into Undergraduate Nursing and Midwifery Curricula | 3 |
| 17 | 67 | |
| 18 | 80 | |
| 19 | Time of day urinary catheters are removed: a study of current practices. | 6 |
| 20 | 25 |
About Elizabeth Watt
Elizabeth Watt is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Radiation and Leadership and Management, having authored 41 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (15 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (10 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (120 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (29 citations) and Leadership and Management (27 citations). Elizabeth Watt has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Edvardsson, Tyler Meyer, Michael Roumeliotis, Siraj Husain, Sarah Quirk, Andrew Scanlon, Leigh Conroy, Karen Long, Wendy Smith and Tien Phan. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Physics, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Radiotherapy and Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.