Gil Bozer

909 total citations
26 papers, 546 citations indexed

About

Gil Bozer is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Gil Bozer has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 546 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 12 papers in Applied Psychology and 11 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Gil Bozer's work include Coaching Methods and Impact (12 papers), Human Resource and Talent Management (11 papers) and Family Business Performance and Succession (6 papers). Gil Bozer is often cited by papers focused on Coaching Methods and Impact (12 papers), Human Resource and Talent Management (11 papers) and Family Business Performance and Succession (6 papers). Gil Bozer collaborates with scholars based in Israel, France and Australia. Gil Bozer's co-authors include Joseph C. Santora, Rebecca J. Jones, James C. Sarros, Leon Levin, Baek‐Kyoo Joo, Kathryn Ready, Silja Kotte, Charmine E. J. Härtel, Andrew Pirola‐Merlo and Mark Esposito and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology and Applied Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Gil Bozer

24 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gil Bozer Israel 11 247 242 236 107 104 26 546
Lisa A. Boyce United States 6 218 0.9× 257 1.1× 245 1.0× 30 0.3× 93 0.9× 7 557
Jeffrey L. Godwin United States 8 211 0.9× 143 0.6× 38 0.2× 89 0.8× 67 0.6× 16 410
Sewon Kim United States 7 252 1.0× 158 0.7× 116 0.5× 19 0.2× 52 0.5× 20 367
Gina Hernez‐Broome United States 6 226 0.9× 199 0.8× 210 0.9× 25 0.2× 73 0.7× 10 489
Sorin Vâlcea United States 8 228 0.9× 94 0.4× 29 0.1× 80 0.7× 62 0.6× 14 396
Andrew J. Vinchur United States 5 231 0.9× 191 0.8× 29 0.1× 39 0.4× 161 1.5× 11 480
Louis Baron Canada 8 179 0.7× 273 1.1× 228 1.0× 14 0.1× 160 1.5× 16 506
Johnathan Nelson United States 8 105 0.4× 100 0.4× 71 0.3× 24 0.2× 32 0.3× 10 314
Ellen J. Mullen United States 7 122 0.5× 281 1.2× 60 0.3× 21 0.2× 128 1.2× 9 443
Xinhui Jiang China 7 192 0.8× 197 0.8× 41 0.2× 16 0.1× 104 1.0× 14 403

Countries citing papers authored by Gil Bozer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gil Bozer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gil Bozer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gil Bozer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gil Bozer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gil Bozer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gil Bozer. The network helps show where Gil Bozer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gil Bozer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gil Bozer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gil Bozer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gil Bozer. Gil Bozer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bozer, Gil, et al.. (2021). The influence of organizational coaching context on pre‐coaching motivation and the role of regulatory focus: An experimental study. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 33(4). 383–403. 7 indexed citations
2.
Bozer, Gil & Rebecca J. Jones. (2020). Introduction to the Special Issue on Advances in the Psychology of Workplace Coaching. Applied Psychology. 70(2). 411–419. 12 indexed citations
3.
Bozer, Gil, et al.. (2019). Bringing Context to Workplace Coaching: A Theoretical Framework Based on Uncertainty Avoidance and Regulatory Focus. Human Resource Development Review. 18(3). 376–402. 26 indexed citations
4.
Joo, Baek‐Kyoo, Gil Bozer, & Kathryn Ready. (2019). A dimensional analysis of psychological empowerment on engagement. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness People and Performance. 6(3). 186–203. 34 indexed citations
5.
Jones, Rebecca J. & Gil Bozer. (2018). Advances in the Psychology of Workplace Coaching. Applied Psychology. 67(4). 768–772. 5 indexed citations
6.
Santora, Joseph C., et al.. (2018). Views of Estonian nonprofit executives on succession: lessons from the field. Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal. 33(3). 5–8. 2 indexed citations
7.
Santora, Joseph C., et al.. (2018). The use of market analytics in the recruitment of high potentials in the pharmaceutical industry. European J of International Management. 1(1). 1–1. 1 indexed citations
8.
Bozer, Gil, Leon Levin, & Joseph C. Santora. (2017). Succession in family business: multi-source perspectives. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 24(4). 753–774. 89 indexed citations
9.
Bozer, Gil & Andrew Pirola‐Merlo. (2017). How effective is your coach?: executive coaching. Figshare. 3(2). 44–45.
10.
Santora, Joseph C., et al.. (2017). How can HR practitioners complement search algorithms in recruitment of high potentials?. Strategic HR Review. 16(3). 150–152. 2 indexed citations
11.
Bozer, Gil, et al.. (2016). Implicit assumptions in high potentials recruitment. European journal of training and development. 40(6). 430–445. 9 indexed citations
12.
Santora, Joseph C., et al.. (2015). Nonprofit Executive Succession Planning and Organizational Sustainability: A Preliminary Comparative Study in Australia, Brazil, Israel, Italy, Russia, and the United States. The Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship. 20(4). 66–83. 6 indexed citations
13.
Bozer, Gil, James C. Sarros, & Joseph C. Santora. (2014). Executive coaching: Guidelines that work. Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal. 28(4). 9–14. 8 indexed citations
14.
Bozer, Gil, James C. Sarros, & Joseph C. Santora. (2014). Academic background and credibility in executive coaching effectiveness. Personnel Review. 43(6). 881–897. 44 indexed citations
15.
Bozer, Gil, James C. Sarros, & Joseph C. Santora. (2013). The role of coachee characteristics in executive coaching for effective sustainability. Journal of Management Development. 32(3). 277–294. 50 indexed citations
16.
Bozer, Gil & James C. Sarros. (2012). Examining the Effectiveness of Executive Coaching on Coachees' Performance in the Israeli Context. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10(1). 14–32. 30 indexed citations
17.
Bozer, Gil, et al.. (2010). Family business leadership transition: How an adaptation of executive coaching may help. Journal of Management & Organization. 15(3). 378–391. 4 indexed citations
18.
Bozer, Gil, et al.. (2010). Family business leadership transition: How an adaptation of executive coaching may help. Journal of Management & Organization. 15(3). 378–391. 17 indexed citations
19.
Bozer, Gil, Leon Levin, & Charmine E. J. Härtel. (2007). Executive coaching in a family business environment. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 4(1). 200–212. 3 indexed citations
20.
Bozer, Gil & Andrew Pirola‐Merlo. (2007). How effective is your coach?. 3(2). 44–45. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026