Gareth Schott

35 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Gareth Schott
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Gender Studies 95
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 77
  • Human-Computer Interaction 29
  • Sociology and Political Science 224
  • Literature and Literary Theory 51
Replace Anastasia Salter with:
Anastasia Salter United States
Heather Smith United Kingdom
Beth Beschorner United States
Rosa Mikeal Martey United States
Astrid Ensslin United Kingdom
Karin Archer Canada
Shelley Stagg Peterson Canada
Lucia Zivcakova Canada
Tanya Christ United States
Boaventura DaCosta South Korea
Gareth Schott relative to Anastasia Salter United States Anastasia Salter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Anastasia Salter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gareth Schott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gareth Schott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gareth Schott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gareth Schott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gareth Schott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gareth Schott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gareth Schott. The network helps show where Gareth Schott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Gareth Schott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gareth Schott Line = papers co-authored together Gareth Schott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200097
2 200039
3 200426
4 200621
5 200419
6 200714
7 201013
8 200813
9
Language-GAME-Players: Articulating the pleasures of ‘violent’ game texts
200810
10 200310
11 20176
12 20125
13
The relational self-concept scale: a context-specific self-report measure for adolescents.
20015
14 20035
15 20144
16 20134
17 20174
18 20084
19 20143
20
The 'dominant effect' of games: Content vs. medium
20133

About Gareth Schott

Gareth Schott is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Gender Studies, having authored 41 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (26 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Games (7 papers), Media Influence and Health (7 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (6 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers) and Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (95 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (77 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (29 citations), Sociology and Political Science (224 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (51 citations). Gareth Schott has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Neil Selwyn, Andrew Burn, Mark Grimshaw, Darrin Hodgetts, Diane Carr, David Buckingham, Maria Kambouri, Pierre Hanna, Frans Mäyrä and Nana K. Poku. Their work appears in journals such as Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, Mortality, Media International Australia and Journal of Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact