Journal of Health Psychology

3.5k papers and 88.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.5k papers published in Journal of Health Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 88.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Health Psychology usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.2k papers), General Health Professions (925 papers) and Social Psychology (725 papers) specifically the topics of Behavioral Health and Interventions (462 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (408 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (222 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Health Psychology are James S. Jackson, David R. Williams, Yan Yu, Norman B. Anderson, Norman Anderssen, Marika Tiggemann, Sarah Grogan, Carl E. Thoresen, Kenneth A. Wallston and Sue Wilkinson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Health Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Health Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Health Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Health Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Health Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Health Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Health Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025