Shelley Stagg Peterson

1.2k total citations
96 papers, 732 citations indexed

About

Shelley Stagg Peterson is a scholar working on Education, Literature and Literary Theory and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Shelley Stagg Peterson has authored 96 papers receiving a total of 732 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 74 papers in Education, 40 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 28 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Shelley Stagg Peterson's work include Literacy, Media, and Education (28 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (28 papers) and EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (24 papers). Shelley Stagg Peterson is often cited by papers focused on Literacy, Media, and Education (28 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (28 papers) and EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (24 papers). Shelley Stagg Peterson collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and New Zealand. Shelley Stagg Peterson's co-authors include Tina Benevides, Eunice Eunhee Jang, Judy M. Parr, James D. Slotta, Shakina Rajendram, Anne Burke, Soon Young Jang, Eva Lindgren, Maria José Botelho and Ruth A. Childs and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Elementary School Journal and Gender and Education.

In The Last Decade

Shelley Stagg Peterson

90 papers receiving 596 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Shelley Stagg Peterson Canada 14 533 239 194 134 76 96 732
Victoria J. Risko United States 17 646 1.2× 251 1.1× 307 1.6× 128 1.0× 129 1.7× 47 924
Beth Maloch United States 16 692 1.3× 213 0.9× 339 1.7× 95 0.7× 143 1.9× 50 895
Anna O. Söter United States 7 555 1.0× 197 0.8× 430 2.2× 171 1.3× 124 1.6× 15 853
Mary M. Juzwik United States 17 471 0.9× 289 1.2× 168 0.9× 197 1.5× 218 2.9× 49 810
Laura B. Smolkin United States 14 464 0.9× 163 0.7× 393 2.0× 60 0.4× 68 0.9× 28 666
Colleen M. Fairbanks United States 11 537 1.0× 137 0.6× 155 0.8× 49 0.4× 131 1.7× 24 670
Jane Medwell United Kingdom 15 588 1.1× 114 0.5× 309 1.6× 113 0.8× 46 0.6× 41 730
Mary C. Daane 6 743 1.4× 132 0.6× 619 3.2× 97 0.7× 71 0.9× 7 988
Gay Ivey United States 12 585 1.1× 300 1.3× 446 2.3× 61 0.5× 116 1.5× 23 837
Andrea Honigsfeld United States 14 472 0.9× 114 0.5× 198 1.0× 145 1.1× 46 0.6× 58 670

Countries citing papers authored by Shelley Stagg Peterson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shelley Stagg Peterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shelley Stagg Peterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shelley Stagg Peterson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shelley Stagg Peterson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shelley Stagg Peterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shelley Stagg Peterson. The network helps show where Shelley Stagg Peterson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shelley Stagg Peterson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shelley Stagg Peterson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shelley Stagg Peterson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shelley Stagg Peterson. Shelley Stagg Peterson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brant, Jennifer, et al.. (2023). Partnership Research with Indigenous Communities: Fostering Community Engagement and Relational Accountability. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 32(1). 99–118. 1 indexed citations
2.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg, et al.. (2021). Assessing Young Children’s Language and Nonverbal Communication in Oral Personal Narratives. 53(2). 6. 1 indexed citations
3.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg, et al.. (2021). Sustaining Indigenous languages and cultures: Māori medium education in Aotearoa New Zealand and Aboriginal Head Start in Canada. Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online. 16(2). 307–323. 3 indexed citations
4.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg, et al.. (2021). Young children’s written and verbal responses in a dynamic assessment context. Assessing Writing. 49. 100543–100543. 5 indexed citations
5.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg & Shakina Rajendram. (2019). Teacher-child and peer talk in collaborative writing and writing-mediated play: Primary classrooms in Northern Canada. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy. 42(1). 28–39. 8 indexed citations
6.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg, et al.. (2019). Play(ful) Pedagogical Practices for Creative Collaborative Literacy. The Reading Teacher. 73(1). 17–27. 4 indexed citations
7.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg, et al.. (2017). Assessing Young Children’s Oral Language: Recommendations for Classroom Practice and Policy. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation. 40(3). 362–392. 9 indexed citations
8.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg, et al.. (2016). Examining Rhetorics of Play in Curricula in Five Provinces: Is Play at Risk in Canadian Kindergartens?. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation. 39(3). 1–26. 2 indexed citations
9.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg. (2015). Dramatic Play Supports Children's Writing in Kindergarten and Grade One. Language arts journal of Michigan. 48(1). 10. 3 indexed citations
10.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg, et al.. (2014). Grades Five and Six Students' Representation of Meaning in Collaborative Wiki Writing. ScholarWorks - WMU (Western Michigan University). 53(3). 1–24. 2 indexed citations
11.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg. (2012). An Analysis of Discourses of Writing and Writing Instruction in Curricula Across Canada. Curriculum Inquiry. 42(2). 260–284. 26 indexed citations
12.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg, et al.. (2012). An Analysis of Large-Scale Writing Assessments in Canada (Grades 5-8). Alberta Journal of Educational Research. 57(4). 424–445. 3 indexed citations
13.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg. (2011). Teaching Writing in Rural Canadian Classrooms. 19(1). 39. 3 indexed citations
14.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg, et al.. (2007). Writing Assessment: What Would Multiliteracies Teachers Do?. 15(1). 29. 6 indexed citations
15.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg, et al.. (2006). Cross-Curricular Literacy: Writing for Learning in a Science Program. Voices from the Middle. 14(2). 31–37. 3 indexed citations
16.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg. (2003). Making the Most of Talk in the Writing Classroom.. English quarterly. 35(1). 1–7. 2 indexed citations
17.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg. (2001). Teachers' Perceptions of Gender Equity in Writing Assessment.. English quarterly. 33. 22–24. 3 indexed citations
18.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg. (2000). Grades four and eight students' and teachers' perceptions of girls' and boys' writing competencies. ScholarWorks - WMU (Western Michigan University). 40(4). 3. 7 indexed citations
19.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg. (2000). Yes, We Do Teach Writing Conventions! (Though the Methods May Be Unconventional).. 34(1). 38–44.
20.
Peterson, Shelley Stagg. (1996). What Matters in Classroom Writing Instruction: An Authentic, Supportive Audience.. 30(3). 3–7. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026