Frederik Van Acker

33 papers receiving 918 citations

Peers

Frederik Van Acker
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Computer Science Applications 89
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 152
  • Information Systems and Management 100
  • Education 401
  • Gender Studies 113
Replace Elizabeth T. Welsh with:
Elizabeth T. Welsh United States
Ana‐Maria Cazan Romania
Muhammad Azeem Ashraf China
Ji-Hye Park South Korea
Peter Eachus United Kingdom
Maria K. DiBenedetto United States
Şirin Karadeniz Türkiye
Kevin C. Larkin United States
Allison Rossett United States
Avner Caspi Israel
Frederik Van Acker relative to Elizabeth T. Welsh United States Elizabeth T. Welsh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Elizabeth T. Welsh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederik Van Acker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederik Van Acker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederik Van Acker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederik Van Acker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederik Van Acker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederik Van Acker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederik Van Acker. The network helps show where Frederik Van Acker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederik Van Acker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederik Van Acker Line = papers co-authored together Frederik Van Acker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012176
2 201383
3 201481
4 201175
5 200973
6 201169
7 201465
8 201443
9 201441
10 201436
11 201431
12 201431
13 201630
14 201425
15 201021
16 200819
17 201416
18 201514
19 201612
20 20176

About Frederik Van Acker

Frederik Van Acker is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, Education and Applied Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 979 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (8 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (4 papers), Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (3 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (89 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (152 citations), Information Systems and Management (100 citations), Education (401 citations) and Gender Studies (113 citations). Frederik Van Acker has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karel Kreijns, Hans van Buuren, Marjan Vermeulen, Paul A. Kirschner, Marijke Verbruggen, Nicky Dries, Hans H. C. M. Savelberg, Peter Theuns, Roland Pepermans and Marc Jegers. Their work appears in journals such as Human Reproduction, Quality & Quantity, Computers in Human Behavior, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology and European Journal of Psychological Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact