Peter Eachus

34 papers receiving 852 citations

Peers

Peter Eachus
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Gender Studies 187
  • Computer Science Applications 72
  • Education 371
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 147
  • Information Systems and Management 79
Replace Şirin Karadeniz with:
Şirin Karadeniz Türkiye
Frederik Van Acker Netherlands
Jacqueline Specht Canada
Thierry Karsenti Canada
Erica McWilliam Australia
Michelle Maher United States
Katie Davis United States
Jessica J. Summers United States
Edward A. Mabry United States
Barbara E. Lovitts United States
Peter Eachus relative to Şirin Karadeniz Türkiye Şirin Karadeniz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Şirin Karadeniz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Eachus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Eachus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Eachus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Eachus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Eachus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Eachus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Eachus. The network helps show where Peter Eachus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Peter Eachus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Eachus Line = papers co-authored together Peter Eachus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002357
2 2000216
3 201653
4 200353
5 201439
6 201832
7 200631
8 200626
9 199526
10 199318
11 200117
12
Creating and validating self-efficacy scales for students.
201216
13 201614
14 199111
15 20129
16 19979
17 19999
18 19908
19 19905
20 20075

About Peter Eachus

Peter Eachus is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Clinical Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 981 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Health and Wellbeing Research (4 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (3 papers), Radiology practices and education (3 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (3 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers) and Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (187 citations), Computer Science Applications (72 citations), Education (371 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (147 citations) and Information Systems and Management (79 citations). Peter Eachus has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Simon Cassidy, Catherine Thompson, Jennifer R. Bradley, Simon J. Cassidy, Alan Barrett, Peter Hogg, David Roberts, Alex W. Stedmon, Les Baillie and Alejandro Domínguez. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Ergonomics, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, European Journal of Ultrasound, Scientific Reports and Educational Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact