Peter Theuns

58 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Peter Theuns
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Applied Psychology 82
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 184
  • Rehabilitation 77
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 134
  • Social Psychology 196
Replace Frank Rijmen with:
Frank Rijmen United States
Seán Hammond United Kingdom
Wilco H. M. Emons Netherlands
Jennifer A. Margrett United States
Anabela Pereira Portugal
Mark H. Stone United States
Damian P. Birney Australia
Victoria Menzies United States
Glenn Rowley Australia
Gwenda Simons United Kingdom
Peter Theuns relative to Frank Rijmen United States Frank Rijmen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Frank Rijmen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Theuns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Theuns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Theuns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Theuns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Theuns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Theuns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Theuns. The network helps show where Peter Theuns may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Theuns, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Theuns Line = papers co-authored together Peter Theuns links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Categories and Concepts: Theoretical Views and Inductive Data Analysis
1993258
2 201694
3 201947
4 201347
5 200846
6 202042
7 201438
8 200637
9 201433
10 202031
11
Recent Progress in Mathematical Psychology
199830
12 200727
13 201425
14 200722
15 201021
16 200721
17 201321
18 200819
19 200816
20 201813

About Peter Theuns

Peter Theuns is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Oncology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (4 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (4 papers), Sleep and related disorders (4 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (82 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (184 citations), Rehabilitation (77 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (134 citations) and Social Psychology (196 citations). Peter Theuns has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Iran and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Joeri Hofmans, James A. Hampton, Iven Van Mechelen, Ryszard S. Michalski, Olivier Maîresse, J. Bernheim, Frederik Van Acker, Bart Neyns, Jennifer Cremer and Anne Rogiers. Their work appears in journals such as Social Indicators Research, Quality & Quantity, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Psycho-Oncology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact