Fred Wiersema

2.0k citations
4 papers · 1.2k · 1 hit paper · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Fred Wiersema

4 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Fred Wiersema's Hit Papers

Customer intimacy and other value disciplines 1993 · 618 citations
6180+11+22Years since publication200400600

Peers

Fred Wiersema
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 425
  • Marketing 369
  • Strategy and Management 593
  • Management Information Systems 305
  • Business and International Management 31
Replace Peter Naudé with:
Peter Naudé United Kingdom
Robert E. Krapfel United States
Cindy Claycomb United States
Gary L. Frankwick United States
Catherine Pardo France
Marius Leibold South Africa
Dae Ryun Chang South Korea
Stephanie Slater United Kingdom
Joseph M. Bonner United States
Thomas S. Wurster Germany
Fred Wiersema relative to Peter Naudé United Kingdom Peter Naudé's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Peter Naudé · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Wiersema

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Wiersema's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Wiersema with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Wiersema more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Wiersema

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Wiersema. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Wiersema. The network helps show where Fred Wiersema may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Fred Wiersema, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred Wiersema Line = papers co-authored together Fred Wiersema links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
#Work
1
Customer intimacy and other value disciplines
Hit paper breakdown →
1993618
2
The Discipline of Market Leaders
1995416
3 2013147
4 201337

About Fred Wiersema

Fred Wiersema is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Computer Science Applications and Infectious Diseases, having authored 4 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Service and Product Innovation (1 paper), Digital Marketing and Social Media (1 paper), Open Source Software Innovations (1 paper) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (425 citations), Marketing (369 citations), Strategy and Management (593 citations), Management Information Systems (305 citations) and Business and International Management (31 citations). Fred Wiersema has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael E. Treacy, Abbie Griffin, Rajesh Chandy, Ely Dahan, Barry L. Bayus, Christopher Miller, Gary L. Lilien, Brett W. Josephson, Ajay K. Kohli and Jelena Spanjol. Their work appears in journals such as Harvard business review, Marketing Letters and Industrial Marketing Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact