Fred Nickols

532 citations
21 papers · 260 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Fred Nickols

13 papers receiving 211 citations

Peers

Fred Nickols
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Applied Psychology 40
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 79
  • Management Information Systems 46
  • Strategy and Management 62
  • Communication 24
Replace Tony Lingham with:
Tony Lingham United States
S.J. van Zolingen Netherlands
Jim Grieves United Kingdom
Steven W. Pool United States
Edward M. Mone United States
Amen Imran Pakistan
George Boak United Kingdom
Robert Bruce Shaw United States
R. J. Bullock United States
Subrena Harris United Kingdom
Fred Nickols relative to Tony Lingham United States Tony Lingham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Tony Lingham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Nickols

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Nickols's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Nickols with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Nickols more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Nickols

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Nickols. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Nickols. The network helps show where Fred Nickols may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Empowerment: The Emperor's New Clothes
199887
2
STRATEGY, STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, STRATEGIC PLANNING AND STRATEGIC THINKING
200843
3
The Knowledge in Knowledge Management
201340
4 200439
5 199817
6
Performance Appraisal: Weighed and Found Wanting in the Balance
200712
7 19956
8 20105
9 19903
10 20112
11 20121
12 20111
13 19941
14 20131
15 19821
16 20161
17 20040
18 20080
19 20090
20 20070

About Fred Nickols

Fred Nickols is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Management Information Systems, General Social Sciences, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Communication, having authored 21 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (7 papers), Information Society and Technology Trends (2 papers), Organizational Change and Leadership (1 paper), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (1 paper), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (1 paper), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (1 paper), Innovation and Knowledge Management (1 paper) and Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (40 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (79 citations), Management Information Systems (46 citations), Strategy and Management (62 citations) and Communication (24 citations). Fred Nickols has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as Harvard business review, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Knowledge and Process Management, Advances in Developing Human Resources and Performance Improvement Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact