George Boak
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Co-authors
- Derek MilneDavid R. ThompsonLindsay MitchellLF BrownJeff GoldDavid DevinsRuth ten HoveChristine Abbott
- Topics
- Organizational Learning and Leadership (11 papers)Management and Organizational Studies (8 papers)Complex Systems and Decision Making (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementResearch and TheoryManagement Science and Operations Research
- Journals
- Leadership & Organization Development JournalCareer Development InternationalJournal of Management Development
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNorway
In The Last Decade
George Boak
32 papers receiving 262 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 113
- Education 75
- Strategy and Management 64
- Social Psychology 54
- Management Science and Operations Research 54
Countries citing papers authored by George Boak
This map shows the geographic impact of George Boak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Boak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Boak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Boak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Boak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Boak. The network helps show where George Boak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Boak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Boak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Boak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Boak. George Boak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Developing managerial competences : the management learning contract approach | 27 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About George Boak
George Boak is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 37 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organizational Learning and Leadership (11 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (8 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (113 citations), Research and Theory (5 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (54 citations). George Boak has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Derek Milne, David R. Thompson, Lindsay Mitchell, LF Brown, Jeff Gold, David Devins, Ruth ten Hove, Christine Abbott, Chandana Sanyal and Peter Watt. Their work appears in journals such as Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Career Development International and Journal of Management Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.